Hi guys,
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 7:39 PM Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> >
> > On 10/4/19 12:53 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 04/10/2019 11:54, Steve Capper:
> > >> I'd recommend also reaching out the BPF maintainers:
> > >> BPF JIT for ARM64
> > >> M: Daniel Borkmann
> > >> M: Alexei Starovoi
On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 8:09 PM Jerin Jacob wrote:
>
> > >>
> > >> This might be one avenue if all kernel JIT contributors would be on
> > >> board.
> > >> Another option I'm wondering could be to extend the bpf() syscall in
> > >> order
> > >> to pass down a description of context and helper map
24/09/2019 19:03, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > Jerin Jacob (8):
> > bpf/arm64: add build infrastructure
> > bpf/arm64: add prologue and epilogue
> > bpf/arm64: add basic arithmetic operations
> > bpf/arm64: add logical operations
> > bpf/arm64: add byte swap operations
> > bpf/arm64: add lo
On Tue, 8 Oct, 2019, 1:45 AM Thomas Monjalon, wrote:
> 07/10/2019 21:29, Jerin Jacob:
> > On Mon, 7 Oct, 2019, 11:35 PM Thomas Monjalon,
> wrote:
> [...]
> > let's restart from the beginning by answering simple questions:
> > > - what are the use cases of BPF in DPDK?
> >
> > If something needs
07/10/2019 21:29, Jerin Jacob:
> On Mon, 7 Oct, 2019, 11:35 PM Thomas Monjalon, wrote:
[...]
> let's restart from the beginning by answering simple questions:
> > - what are the use cases of BPF in DPDK?
>
> If something needs to be dynamically controlled then eBPF can be used,
> couple of use c
On Mon, 7 Oct, 2019, 11:35 PM Thomas Monjalon, wrote:
> 07/10/2019 15:00, Jerin Jacob:
> > On Mon, 7 Oct, 2019, 6:03 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 04/10/2019 17:39, Jerin Jacob:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 8:35 PM Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 6:21 PM Thomas M
07/10/2019 15:00, Jerin Jacob:
> On Mon, 7 Oct, 2019, 6:03 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 04/10/2019 17:39, Jerin Jacob:
> > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 8:35 PM Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 6:21 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > > > 03/09/2019 12:59, jer...@marvell.com:
>
On Mon, 7 Oct, 2019, 6:03 PM Thomas Monjalon, wrote:
> 04/10/2019 17:39, Jerin Jacob:
> > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 8:35 PM Ananyev, Konstantin
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 6:21 PM Thomas Monjalon
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > 03/09/2019 12:59, je
04/10/2019 17:39, Jerin Jacob:
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 8:35 PM Ananyev, Konstantin
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 6:21 PM Thomas Monjalon
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 03/09/2019 12:59, jer...@marvell.com:
> > > > > Added eBPF arm64 JIT support to improve th
Hi everyone,
> > >>
> > >> This might be one avenue if all kernel JIT contributors would be on
> > >> board.
> > >> Another option I'm wondering could be to extend the bpf() syscall in
> > >> order
> > >> to pass down a description of context and helper mappings e.g. via BTF
> > >> and
> > >
> >>
> >> This might be one avenue if all kernel JIT contributors would be on board.
> >> Another option I'm wondering could be to extend the bpf() syscall in order
> >> to pass down a description of context and helper mappings e.g. via BTF and
> >> let everything go through the verifier in the ker
On 10/4/19 4:43 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 7:39 PM Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 10/4/19 12:53 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
04/10/2019 11:54, Steve Capper:
I'd recommend also reaching out the BPF maintainers:
BPF JIT for ARM64
M: Daniel Borkmann
M: Alexei Starovoitov
M: Z
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 8:35 PM Ananyev, Konstantin
wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 6:21 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > >
> > > 03/09/2019 12:59, jer...@marvell.com:
> > > > Added eBPF arm64 JIT support to improve the eBPF program performance
> > > > on arm64.
> > > >
> > >
On 10/4/19 12:53 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
04/10/2019 11:54, Steve Capper:
I'd recommend also reaching out the BPF maintainers:
BPF JIT for ARM64
M: Daniel Borkmann
M: Alexei Starovoitov
M: Zi Shen Lim
L: net...@vger.kernel.org
L: b...@vger.kernel.org
S: Support
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 7:39 PM Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
> On 10/4/19 12:53 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 04/10/2019 11:54, Steve Capper:
> >> I'd recommend also reaching out the BPF maintainers:
> >> BPF JIT for ARM64
> >> M: Daniel Borkmann
> >> M: Alexei Starovoitov
> >> M: Zi Shen Lim
04/10/2019 11:54, Steve Capper:
> I'd recommend also reaching out the BPF maintainers:
> BPF JIT for ARM64
> M:Daniel Borkmann
> M:Alexei Starovoitov
> M:Zi Shen Lim
> L:net...@vger.kernel.org
> L:b...@vger.kernel.org
> S:Supported
> F:arch/arm64/net/
>
> As they wil
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 05:55:18AM +0100, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> Adding Arm JIT and Kernel experts
Hi Honnappa,
I'd recommend also reaching out the BPF maintainers:
BPF JIT for ARM64
M: Daniel Borkmann
M: Alexei Starovoitov
M: Zi Shen Lim
L: net...@vger.kernel.org
L:
; Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/8] eBPF arm64 JIT support
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 6:21 PM Thomas Monjalon
> wrote:
> > >
> > > 03/09/2019 12:59, jer...@marvell.com:
> > > > Added eBPF arm64 JIT support to improve
Hi everyone,
>
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 6:21 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >
> > 03/09/2019 12:59, jer...@marvell.com:
> > > Added eBPF arm64 JIT support to improve the eBPF program performance
> > > on arm64.
> > >
> > > lib/librte_bpf/bpf_jit_arm64.c | 1451
> >
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 6:21 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> 03/09/2019 12:59, jer...@marvell.com:
> > Added eBPF arm64 JIT support to improve the eBPF program performance
> > on arm64.
> >
> > lib/librte_bpf/bpf_jit_arm64.c | 1451
>
> I am concerned about duplicatin
03/09/2019 12:59, jer...@marvell.com:
> Added eBPF arm64 JIT support to improve the eBPF program performance
> on arm64.
>
> lib/librte_bpf/bpf_jit_arm64.c | 1451
I am concerned about duplicating the BPF JIT effort in DPDK and Linux.
Could we try to pull the Linu
>
> Added eBPF arm64 JIT support to improve the eBPF program performance
> on arm64.
>
> dpdk.org/examples/bpf/t1.c application shows around 50% improvement
> on OCTEON TX2 platform in JIT vs interpreter mode.
>
> Verified the implementation using existing bpf_autotest application.
>
> # ech
From: Jerin Jacob
Added eBPF arm64 JIT support to improve the eBPF program performance
on arm64.
dpdk.org/examples/bpf/t1.c application shows around 50% improvement
on OCTEON TX2 platform in JIT vs interpreter mode.
Verified the implementation using existing bpf_autotest application.
# echo "b
23 matches
Mail list logo
