04/10/2019 11:54, Steve Capper: > I'd recommend also reaching out the BPF maintainers: > BPF JIT for ARM64 > M: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net> > M: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@kernel.org> > M: Zi Shen Lim <zlim....@gmail.com> > L: net...@vger.kernel.org > L: b...@vger.kernel.org > S: Supported > F: arch/arm64/net/ > > As they will have much better knowledge of the state of play and will be > better able to advise.
As far as I know Alexei and Daniel are OK with the idea. But better to let them reply here. I suggest we think about a way to package the kernel BPF JIT for userspace usage (not only DPDK) as a library. I don't understand why the DPDK JIT should be different or optimized differently. The only real issue I see is the need for a dual licensing BSD-GPL.
