Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: fix crypto_op length for sessionless case

2021-07-06 Thread Brandon Lo
Hi all, I have rerun the failing unit test. It also recreated the report, so that category should be passing now. Currently, I am looking more into the ABI test that is failing on Arch, as well as the failures with DTS tests. I will keep this thread updated. Thanks, Brandon On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 a

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: fix crypto_op length for sessionless case

2021-07-04 Thread Gujjar, Abhinandan S
Hi Jerin/Akhil, Could you please review the patch? Regards Abhinandan > -Original Message- > From: Yigit, Ferruh > Sent: Saturday, July 3, 2021 4:56 AM > To: Gujjar, Abhinandan S ; dev@dpdk.org; > jer...@marvell.com; dpdk...@iol.unh.edu; acon...@redhat.com > Cc: gak...@marvell.com; Powe

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: fix crypto_op length for sessionless case

2021-07-02 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 7/2/2021 7:08 PM, Gujjar, Abhinandan S wrote: > Hi Aaron/dpdklab, > > This patch's CI seems to have lot of false positive! > Ferruh triggered the re-test sometime back. Now, it is reporting less. > Could you please check from your end? Thanks! > Only a malloc related unit test is still failin

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: fix crypto_op length for sessionless case

2021-07-02 Thread Gujjar, Abhinandan S
Hi Aaron/dpdklab, This patch's CI seems to have lot of false positive! Ferruh triggered the re-test sometime back. Now, it is reporting less. Could you please check from your end? Thanks! Regards Abhinandan > -Original Message- > From: Gujjar, Abhinandan S > Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: fix crypto_op length for sessionless case

2021-06-30 Thread Abhinandan Gujjar
Currently, private_data_offset for the sessionless is computed wrongly which includes extra bytes added because of using sizeof(struct rte_crypto_sym_xform) * 2) instead of (sizeof(union rte_event_crypto_metadata)). Due to this buffer overflow, the corruption was leading to test application crash w