Hi Jerin/Akhil,
Could you please review the patch?
Regards
Abhinandan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
> Sent: Saturday, July 3, 2021 4:56 AM
> To: Gujjar, Abhinandan S <abhinandan.guj...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> jer...@marvell.com; dpdk...@iol.unh.edu; acon...@redhat.com
> Cc: gak...@marvell.com; Power, Ciara <ciara.po...@intel.com>; Ali Alnubani
> <alia...@nvidia.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: fix crypto_op length for sessionless case
>
> On 7/2/2021 7:08 PM, Gujjar, Abhinandan S wrote:
> > Hi Aaron/dpdklab,
> >
> > This patch's CI seems to have lot of false positive!
> > Ferruh triggered the re-test sometime back. Now, it is reporting less.
> > Could you please check from your end? Thanks!
> >
>
> Only a malloc related unit test is still failing, which seems unrelated with
> the
> patch. I am triggering it one more time, third time lucky.
>
> Also after re-run, some tests passing now still shown as fail in the patchwork
> checks table. Isn't re-run sending the patchwork test status again?
>
> > Regards
> > Abhinandan
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Gujjar, Abhinandan S <abhinandan.guj...@intel.com>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2021 6:17 PM
> >> To: dev@dpdk.org; jer...@marvell.com
> >> Cc: gak...@marvell.com; Gujjar, Abhinandan S
> >> <abhinandan.guj...@intel.com>; Power, Ciara <ciara.po...@intel.com>
> >> Subject: [PATCH] test: fix crypto_op length for sessionless case
> >>
> >> Currently, private_data_offset for the sessionless is computed
> >> wrongly which includes extra bytes added because of using
> >> sizeof(struct
> >> rte_crypto_sym_xform) * 2) instead of (sizeof(union
> >> rte_event_crypto_metadata)). Due to this buffer overflow, the
> >> corruption was leading to test application crash while freeing the ops
> mempool.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 3c2c535ecfc0 ("test: add event crypto adapter auto-test")
> >> Reported-by: ciara.po...@intel.com
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Abhinandan Gujjar <abhinandan.guj...@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >> app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c | 4 ++--
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
> >> b/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
> >> index f689bc1f2..688ac0b2f 100644
> >> --- a/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
> >> +++ b/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
> >> @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ test_op_forward_mode(uint8_t session_less)
> >> first_xform = &cipher_xform;
> >> sym_op->xform = first_xform;
> >> uint32_t len = IV_OFFSET + MAXIMUM_IV_LENGTH +
> >> - (sizeof(struct rte_crypto_sym_xform) * 2);
> >> + (sizeof(union
> >> + rte_event_crypto_metadata));
> >> op->private_data_offset = len;
> >> /* Fill in private data information */
> >> rte_memcpy(&m_data.response_info, &response_info, @@ -
> >> 424,7 +424,7 @@ test_op_new_mode(uint8_t session_less)
> >> first_xform = &cipher_xform;
> >> sym_op->xform = first_xform;
> >> uint32_t len = IV_OFFSET + MAXIMUM_IV_LENGTH +
> >> - (sizeof(struct rte_crypto_sym_xform) * 2);
> >> + (sizeof(union
> >> + rte_event_crypto_metadata));
> >> op->private_data_offset = len;
> >> /* Fill in private data information */
> >> rte_memcpy(&m_data.response_info, &response_info,
> >> --
> >> 2.25.1
> >
