On 3/6/2017 2:15 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>
>> On Mar 5, 2017, at 3:35 PM, Yigit, Ferruh wrote:
>>
>> On 3/3/2017 8:54 AM, Pascal Mazon wrote:
>>> The call to rte_eth_dev_allocate(tap_name) sets dev->data->name to
>>> tap_name (e.g. "dtap0").
>>>
>>> A look-up using tap_name is expected to return
> On Mar 5, 2017, at 3:35 PM, Yigit, Ferruh wrote:
>
> On 3/3/2017 8:54 AM, Pascal Mazon wrote:
>> The call to rte_eth_dev_allocate(tap_name) sets dev->data->name to
>> tap_name (e.g. "dtap0").
>>
>> A look-up using tap_name is expected to return this device, not a
>> look-up using name (e.g. "
On 3/3/2017 8:54 AM, Pascal Mazon wrote:
> The call to rte_eth_dev_allocate(tap_name) sets dev->data->name to
> tap_name (e.g. "dtap0").
>
> A look-up using tap_name is expected to return this device, not a
> look-up using name (e.g. "net_tap0").
This will break rte_pmd_tap_remove(), because it g
> On Mar 3, 2017, at 2:54 AM, Pascal Mazon wrote:
>
> The call to rte_eth_dev_allocate(tap_name) sets dev->data->name to
> tap_name (e.g. "dtap0").
>
> A look-up using tap_name is expected to return this device, not a
> look-up using name (e.g. "net_tap0").
>
> Signed-off-by: Pascal Mazon
Ac
The call to rte_eth_dev_allocate(tap_name) sets dev->data->name to
tap_name (e.g. "dtap0").
A look-up using tap_name is expected to return this device, not a
look-up using name (e.g. "net_tap0").
Signed-off-by: Pascal Mazon
---
drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+
5 matches
Mail list logo