> -Original Message-
> From: Stillwell Jr, Paul M
> Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2019 1:46 AM
> To: Igor Russkikh ; Ido Goshen
> ; Ananyev, Konstantin
> ; Lu, Wenzhuo
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: 10GBASE-T SFP+ copper support
>>> TABLE 5-3 TRANSCEIVER COMPLIANCE CODES
>>> 10G Ethernet Compliance Codes
>>> 3 7 10G Base-ER
>>> 3 6 10G Base-LRM
>>> 3 5 10G Base-LR
>>> 3 4 10G Base-SR
>>> Infiniband Compliance Codes
>>> 3 3 1X SX
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: dev On Behalf Of Igor Russkikh
> Sent: Monday, May 6, 2019 4:22 AM
> To: Ido Goshen ; Ananyev, Konstantin
> ; Lu, Wenzhuo
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: 10GBASE-T SFP+ copper support
>
>>>
>>> The hw->allow_unsupported_sfp is used too late in
>>> https://git.dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-net-intel/tree/drivers/net/ixgbe/b
>>> ase/ixgbe_phy.c#n1530 And if we've already got out earlier in
>>> https://git.dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-net-intel/tree/drivers/net/ixgbe/b
>>> ase/ixgbe_phy.c#n150
> -Original Message-
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 2:41 AM
> To: Ido Goshen ; Lu, Wenzhuo
>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] net/ixgbe: 10GBASE-T SFP+ copper support
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ido Goshen [mailto:i...@cgstowerne
> -Original Message-
> From: Ido Goshen [mailto:i...@cgstowernetworks.com]
> Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2019 7:54 AM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin ; Lu, Wenzhuo
>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] net/ixgbe: 10GBASE-T SFP+ copper support
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From
> -Original Message-
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 3:13 PM
> To: Ido Goshen ; Lu, Wenzhuo
>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] net/ixgbe: 10GBASE-T SFP+ copper support
>
>
>
> > > > From: Ido Goshen
> > > >
> > > > 10BASE-T SFP+ copper transceiver
> > > From: Ido Goshen
> > >
> > > 10BASE-T SFP+ copper transceivers become cheaper and popular So far
> > > those were blocked by ixgbe as “unsupported”.
> > > e.g.
> > > eth_ixgbe_dev_init(): Unsupported SFP+ Module
> > > eth_ixgbe_dev_init(): Hardware Initialization Failure: -19
> > > E
> -Original Message-
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 2:47 PM
> To: Ido Goshen ; Lu, Wenzhuo
>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] net/ixgbe: 10GBASE-T SFP+ copper support
>
>
>
> >
> > From: Ido Goshen
> >
> > 10BASE-T SFP+ copper transceivers bec
>
> From: Ido Goshen
>
> 10BASE-T SFP+ copper transceivers become cheaper and popular
> So far those were blocked by ixgbe as “unsupported”.
> e.g.
> eth_ixgbe_dev_init(): Unsupported SFP+ Module
> eth_ixgbe_dev_init(): Hardware Initialization Failure: -19
> EAL: Requested de
From: Ido Goshen
10BASE-T SFP+ copper transceivers become cheaper and popular
So far those were blocked by ixgbe as “unsupported”.
e.g.
eth_ixgbe_dev_init(): Unsupported SFP+ Module
eth_ixgbe_dev_init(): Hardware Initialization Failure: -19
EAL: Requested device :0a:00
11 matches
Mail list logo
