> -Original Message-
> From: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 11:39 AM
> To: Van Haaren, Harry ; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: add new prefetch0_write variant
>
> >> >This commit adds a new rte_prefetch
>> >This commit adds a new rte_prefetch0_write() variant, suggests to
>the
>> >compiler to use a prefetch instruction with intention to write. As a
>> >compiler builtin, the compiler can choose based on compilation
>target
>> >what the best implementation for this instruction is.
>>
>> Why not have
> -Original Message-
> From: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
> Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2020 9:11 PM
> To: Van Haaren, Harry ; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: add new prefetch0_write variant
>
> >This commit adds a new rte_prefetch0_write()
>This commit adds a new rte_prefetch0_write() variant, suggests to the
>compiler to use a prefetch instruction with intention to write. As a
>compiler builtin, the compiler can choose based on compilation target
>what the best implementation for this instruction is.
Why not have the other varian
This commit adds a new rte_prefetch0_write() variant, suggests to the
compiler to use a prefetch instruction with intention to write. As a
compiler builtin, the compiler can choose based on compilation target
what the best implementation for this instruction is.
Signed-off-by: Harry van Haaren
-
5 matches
Mail list logo
