Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/interrupts: add function to allow interruptible epoll

2020-07-15 Thread Harman Kalra
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 10:41:33PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:20:37 -0700 > Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > The existing definition of rte_epoll_wait retries if interrupted > > by a signal. This behavior makes it hard to use rte_epoll_wait > > for applications that wa

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/interrupts: add function to allow interruptible epoll

2020-07-14 Thread Honnappa Nagarahalli
Hi Stephen, Looks good overall, few nits inline. > -Original Message- > From: dev On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2019 12:21 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Stephen Hemminger > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/interrupts: add

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/interrupts: add function to allow interruptible epoll

2020-07-13 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:20:37 -0700 Stephen Hemminger wrote: > The existing definition of rte_epoll_wait retries if interrupted > by a signal. This behavior makes it hard to use rte_epoll_wait > for applications that want to use signals do do things like > exit polling loop and shutdown. > > Sinc

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/interrupts: add function to allow interruptible epoll

2019-07-24 Thread Stephen Hemminger
The existing definition of rte_epoll_wait retries if interrupted by a signal. This behavior makes it hard to use rte_epoll_wait for applications that want to use signals do do things like exit polling loop and shutdown. Since changing existing semantic might break applications, add a new rte_epoll