On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:20:37 -0700 Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> The existing definition of rte_epoll_wait retries if interrupted > by a signal. This behavior makes it hard to use rte_epoll_wait > for applications that want to use signals do do things like > exit polling loop and shutdown. > > Since changing existing semantic might break applications, add > a new rte_epoll_wait_interruptible() function that does the > same thing as rte_epoll_wait but will return -1 and errno of EINTR > if it receives a signal. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> This patch has been sitting unreviewed, uncommented, and unmerged for two releases. It seems only patches from HW vendors get the attention.
