On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 12:41 PM Doherty, Declan
wrote:
> >> @@ -789,33 +781,9 @@ rte_cryptodev_stats_reset(uint8_t dev_id);
> >>* the last valid element has it's op field set to
> >>* RTE_CRYPTO_OP_TYPE_UNDEFINED.
> >>*/
> >> -
> >> -void
> >> +extern void
> > Nit: no need for extern.
On 06/10/2020 1:32 PM, David Marchand wrote:
For the title, I would suggest: "cryptodev: remove v20 ABI compatibility"
You did this change using a revert, but still, we can avoid restoring
coding style issues, see nits below.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 12:00 PM Adam Dybkowski
wrote:
This reve
> -Original Message-
> From: David Marchand
> Sent: Tuesday, 6 October, 2020 14:32
> To: Dybkowski, AdamX
> Cc: dev ; Trahe, Fiona ; Akhil Goyal
> ; Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
> ; Thomas Monjalon
> ; Ray Kinsella
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] cryptodev: r
For the title, I would suggest: "cryptodev: remove v20 ABI compatibility"
You did this change using a revert, but still, we can avoid restoring
coding style issues, see nits below.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 12:00 PM Adam Dybkowski
wrote:
>
> This reverts commit a0f0de06d457753c94688d551a6e8659b4d
-Original Message-
From: Dybkowski, AdamX
Sent: piÄ…tek, 14 sierpnia 2020 12:00
To: dev@dpdk.org; Trahe, Fiona ; akhil.go...@nxp.com
Cc: Dybkowski, AdamX ; Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
Subject: [PATCH] cryptodev: revert ABI compatibility for ChaCha20-Poly1305
This reverts commit a0f0de06d4577
This reverts commit a0f0de06d457753c94688d551a6e8659b4d4e041 as the
rte_cryptodev_info_get function versioning was a temporary solution
to maintain ABI compatibility for ChaCha20-Poly1305 and is not
needed in 20.11.
Fixes: a0f0de06d457 ("cryptodev: fix ABI compatibility for ChaCha20-Poly1305")
Si
6 matches
Mail list logo