Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH] doc: announce changes in security session struct

> > > > > The structure rte_security_session is not directly used > > > > > by the application. The application just need an opaque > > > > > pointer to attached to the mbuf or rte_crypto_op while > > > > > enqueue. Hence, it can be hidden inside the library > > > > > and would prevent unnecessary

Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH] doc: announce changes in security session struct

On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 9:45 AM Anoob Joseph wrote: > > > Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] doc: announce changes in security session struct > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 5:36 AM Ananyev, Konstantin > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The structure rte_security_session is not directly used > > > > by the

Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH] doc: announce changes in security session struct

> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] doc: announce changes in security session struct > > > On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 5:36 AM Ananyev, Konstantin > wrote: > > > > > > > The structure rte_security_session is not directly used > > > by the application. The application just need an opaque > > > pointer to att