On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 9:45 AM Anoob Joseph <ano...@marvell.com> wrote: > > > Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] doc: announce changes in security session struct > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 5:36 AM Ananyev, Konstantin > > <konstantin.anan...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The structure rte_security_session is not directly used > > > > by the application. The application just need an opaque > > > > pointer to attached to the mbuf or rte_crypto_op while > > > > enqueue. Hence, it can be hidden inside the library > > > > and would prevent unnecessary indirection to the priv > > > > session data in fastpath. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Akhil Goyal <gak...@marvell.com> > > > > --- > > > > doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 4 ++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst > > b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst > > > > index c540c90f8e..8da1c2648c 100644 > > > > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst > > > > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst > > > > @@ -159,3 +159,7 @@ Deprecation Notices > > > > * security: The functions ``rte_security_set_pkt_metadata`` and > > > > ``rte_security_get_userdata`` will be made inline functions and > > > > additional > > > > flags will be added in structure ``rte_security_ctx`` in DPDK 21.11. > > > > + > > > > +* security: Hide stucture ``rte_security_session`` and expose an opaque > > > > + pointer for the private data to the application which can be attached > > > > + to the packet while enqueuing. > > > > -- > > > > > > Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.anan...@intel.com> > > Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com> > > Acked-by: Anoob Joseph <ano...@marvell.com>
Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jer...@marvell.com>