Series-acked-by: Kai Ji
> -Original Message-
> From: Arek Kusztal
> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2022 8:44 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: gak...@marvell.com; Zhang, Roy Fan ; Kusztal,
> ArkadiuszX
> Subject: [PATCH v4 0/3] cryptodev: move dh type from xform to dh o
Hi Akhil,
> -Original Message-
> From: Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2022 8:26 AM
> To: Akhil Goyal ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Zhang, Roy Fan
> Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH v4 0/3] cryptodev: move dh type from xform to dh op
>
>
>
> > -Orig
> -Original Message-
> From: Akhil Goyal
> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2022 5:58 PM
> To: Kusztal, ArkadiuszX ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Zhang, Roy Fan
> Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH v4 0/3] cryptodev: move dh type from xform to dh op
>
> Hi Arek,
> > Operati
Hi Arek,
> Operation type (PUBLIC_KEY_GENERATION, SHARED_SECRET) should
> be free to choose for any operation. One xform/session should
> be enough to perform both DH operations, if op_type would be xform
> member, session would have to be to be created twice for the same
> group. Similar problem w
> -Original Message-
> From: Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2022 8:44 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: gak...@marvell.com; Zhang, Roy Fan ; Kusztal,
> ArkadiuszX
> Subject: [PATCH v4 0/3] cryptodev: move dh type from xform to dh op
>
> Operation
Operation type (PUBLIC_KEY_GENERATION, SHARED_SECRET) should
be free to choose for any operation. One xform/session should
be enough to perform both DH operations, if op_type would be xform
member, session would have to be to be created twice for the same
group. Similar problem would be observed in
6 matches
Mail list logo
