10/05/2022 14:11, Tom Rix:
> On 5/9/22 2:45 PM, Chautru, Nicolas wrote:
> > From: Tom Rix
> >> On 4/27/22 11:17 AM, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
> >>> Catch exception in PMD in case of invalid input parameter.
> >> It is not clear if this is 1 fix or 2.
> >>
> >> But it does look like an acc100 fix so i
; david.march...@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] baseband/acc100: add protection for some
negative scenario
On 4/27/22 11:17 AM, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
Catch exception in PMD in case of invalid input parameter.
It is not clear if this is 1 fix or 2.
But it does look like an acc100 fix so it
...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] baseband/acc100: add protection for some
> negative scenario
>
>
> On 4/27/22 11:17 AM, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
> > Catch exception in PMD in case of invalid input parameter.
>
> It is not clear if this is 1 fix or 2.
>
On 4/27/22 11:17 AM, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
Catch exception in PMD in case of invalid input parameter.
It is not clear if this is 1 fix or 2.
But it does look like an acc100 fix so it should be split from the
acc101 patchset.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru
---
drivers/baseband/acc100
Catch exception in PMD in case of invalid input parameter.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru
---
drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c
b/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c
index b588f5f..a13
5 matches
Mail list logo