Re: [PATCH v1] dts: add time delay to async sniffer callback function

2024-11-13 Thread Patrick Robb
As best as I can tell -1 vs -2 index is not important as they are named args, and using the -2 breaks functionality. But we can chat tomorrow if you don't agree. Applied the v1 + my fixup per my comments above to next-dts.

Re: [PATCH v1] dts: add time delay to async sniffer callback function

2024-11-13 Thread Patrick Robb
On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 3:17 PM Paul Szczepanek wrote: > > On 30/10/2024 17:08, Nicholas Pratte wrote: > > There exists a bug within i40e NICs in which the async sniffer does not > > catch send packets as a result of the callback function sending packets > > too quickly before the NICs are ready t

Re: [PATCH v1] dts: add time delay to async sniffer callback function

2024-11-06 Thread Paul Szczepanek
On 30/10/2024 17:08, Nicholas Pratte wrote: > There exists a bug within i40e NICs in which the async sniffer does not > catch send packets as a result of the callback function sending packets > too quickly before the NICs are ready to start capturing. > > There could be a multitude of reasons wh

[PATCH v1] dts: add time delay to async sniffer callback function

2024-10-30 Thread Nicholas Pratte
There exists a bug within i40e NICs in which the async sniffer does not catch send packets as a result of the callback function sending packets too quickly before the NICs are ready to start capturing. There could be a multitude of reasons why this happens on these NICs, but for the time being, in