E_FDIR_MODE_SIGNATURE,
};
Regards,
Haifeng
-Original Message-
From: Zhang, Helin [mailto:helin.zh...@intel.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 11:18 AM
To: lhffjzh; 'Thomas Monjalon'
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; maintainers at dpdk.org
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Why only rx queue "0&q
he others queue always receive nothing. but it is work well
on ixgbe
10G NICs, I can receive network packet from all rx queues. does anyone
kindly know why?
Regards,
Haifeng
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monja...@6wind.com]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 6:55 PM
T
Hi,
BTW, I try on both 1.7.1 and 1.8.0.
Thanks and Regards,
Haifeng
-Original Message-
From: dev-bounces at dpdk.org [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of
lhffjzh
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 4:47 PM
To: 'Sujith Sankar (ssujith)'; 'Wiles, Keith'; 'Th
Hi All,
We use 4 cores loop 4 rx queues on one i40e port, but only rx queue "0" can
receive network packet, do anyone kindly know why? BTW, all of network
packet has same destination ip address but has more than 200 different
source ip address.
In addition, by our test, all of rx queues can recei
Hi DPDK maintainers,
We encounter confusion recently which is 40G i40e NICs bond issue, our
bonding logic as below, the ixgbe bonding is running well both 1.7.1 and
1.8.0, but i40e are all failed.
Create bond port -> config slave ports(tx/rx) -> start slave ports -> add
slave port into bond p
5 matches
Mail list logo
