Some quick update from Intel on RC4 testing
Summary
1. Totally execution percentage is around 90%, pass rate is around 98%
2. Created 2 new medium/low issue in RC4.
Details:
1. Intel NIC PMD PF & VF regression: 95% executed, 0 critical issue and high
issue found.
Function cases include rx/tx
Hi, all
Below is the report from Intel validation team.
Summary:
1. Totally 9852 test cases for 19.11 RC4, 9852 cases are executed, 9819 test
cases passed, 33 test cases failed. Execution rate is 100%, pass rate is
99.67%.
2. All Intel build tests(30 different configurations) passed. No cri
Good doc, some suggestions
Better to list the exact firmware versions: 6.01 0x80003221
And better to give the NIC name and device id and etc, as below. Thx.
Intel(R) Ethernet Converged Network Adapter X710-DA4 (4x10G)
Firmware version: 6.01 0x80003221
Device id (pf/vf): 8086:1572 / 8086:154c
Driv
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Burakov, Anatoly
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 10:01 PM
> To: Stojaczyk, DariuszX ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] memory: fix alignment in
> eal_get_virtual_area()
>
> On 1
Dear all
Agenda [1] for DPDK PRC Summit 2018 June 28th in Beijing is announced. You can
also go to dpdk.org/events to check the schedule and do the registration.
The agenda covers diverse categories as NFV, Virtualization, Smart NIC,
framework and Cloud. And there are many interesting topics such
Dear all
Thanks to Linux Foundation's work, now DPDK registration is open. You can go to
http://dpdk.org/events and see there are two options. One is to register
LinuxCon + DPDK, and the other is to register DPDK only. You can register
depends on your preference. And DPDK PRC Summit registration
2018 DPDK PRC Summit will take place in the China National Convention Center,
Beijing on June 28th. The agenda will cover the latest developments to the DPDK
and other related projects such as FD.io, Lagopus, OVS, DPVS, Tungsten Fabric
and SPDK, including plans for future releases, and will prov
Any update, Olivier?
We are near to release, and the bug-fix is important for the virtio vector path
usage. Thanks.
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier Matz
> Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 4:28 PM
> To: Yao, Lei A
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; y
annot be used
EAL: No probed ethernet devices
Interactive-mode selected
USER1: create a new mbuf pool : n=179456, size=2176,
socket=0
USER1: create a new mbuf pool : n=179456, size=2176,
socket=1
Done
testpmd>
it can be seen "No probed ethernet devices"
From: Lin, Xueqin
Sent: Monda
Anyone can help check below build errors?
> -Original Message-
> From: sys_stv
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 4:15 AM
> To: waterman@intel.com; DPDK_SW_ENG ;
> NPG SW Core Tools PRC
> Subject: | ERROR | daily Intel builds (54/60)
>
> Last commit Time : Mon Apr 10 19:52:17 2017 +0
Great, thx, Anatoly.
> -Original Message-
> From: Burakov, Anatoly
> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 5:00 PM
> To: Xu, Qian Q ; gowrishanka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com;
> dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Lu, PeipeiX ; Gilmore, Walter E
> ; Jain, Deepak K ;
> Richardson, Bruce
>
Hi, Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
Could you help check below build error? On some old kernels, the build failed
due to your patch. Thx.
There's build error on old kernels which was brought by commit
"0fe9830b53452a6747cae9ff1a6bfc737b839a9d":
> commit 0fe9830b53452a6747cae9ff1a6bfc737b839a9
Hi, all
I'm pleased to announce that DPDK 17.02 Intel performance reports are available
at below links. Please take a look at them and welcome your comments. Special
thanks to Yulong, Pei and Lei, Yao to make the reports!
DPDK 17.02 Intel NIC Performance Report:
http://fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/DP
Helin/Jingjing
Could you give some answers here? Thx.
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 6:07 PM
> To: Zhang, Helin ; Wu, Jingjing
> Cc: Mcnamara, John ; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] i40e qu
Thomas
For validation, we don't expect too much difference b/w RC1 and RC2. If only
1-2 features gap, then it's acceptable, but if
too many features differences b/w RC1 and RC2, then RC1 test result may be
meaningless.
If some patches are ready, could we merge them to master branch ASAP, we hav
sta...@dpdk.org; Xu, Qian Q ; Liu,
> Yong
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/6] net/virtio: fix wrong Rx/Tx method for
> secondary process
>
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 03:15:00PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 18:16:16 +0800
> > Yuanhan Liu w
As far as I know, L2FWD only uses 1 core for all RX/TX, for all queues, but for
ip_pipeline, you may use more cores.
A simple question, are you using 1core in ip_pipeline or l3fwd test?
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Royce Niu
> Sent: Thursda
Yaron
Could you also share your test case step by step here? I want to learn from u
on the cases.
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yuanhan Liu
> Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 3:19 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Yaron Illouz ; Yuanhan Liu
>
> S
It is good that RC1 on Jan.11th is a hard deadline. We also need ensure that
RC1 is a complete package with all features. If RC1 is out but missing some big
features, then the test results on RC1 vs RC2 may have big difference.
So, could we ensure that RC1 is a complete feature package, if any f
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Maxime Coquelin
Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2016 4:11 PM
To: Wang, Zhihong ; Yuanhan Liu
Cc: mst at redhat.com; dev at dpdk.org; vkaplans at redhat.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] vhost: Add indirect descripto
In my BDW-EP platform(similar to HSW), I can also see the performance drop. So
what's the next step now?
Intel CPU GEN:
SNB-->IVB--->HSW-->BDW-EP
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Maxime Coquelin
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 6:53 PM
To: Yuanhan
Yuanhan
So we will get the package for testing on Oct.26th, right? Thx.
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yuanhan Liu
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 5:27 PM
To: dpdk stable
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] 16.07.1 stable patches review and tes
Tested-by: Qian Xu
- Apply patch to dpdk-next-virtio: Pass
- Compile: Pass
- OS: Ubuntu16.04 4.4.0-34-generic
- GCC: 5.4.0
Test Case - Pass, over 20% performance gain for big packet(1024B), and it's
designed to improve big packet performance.
- Test case: Without NIC, Vhost dequeuer, virtio TXo
virtual devices.
Virtio_user is also a virtual device, do we need to change the name,too?
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Xu, Qian Q
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 11:23 AM
To: Maxime Coquelin ; Yuanhan Liu
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-d
Oh, thx for the info, it's better to have some documentation update in R16.11
release notes.
-Original Message-
From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coque...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 11:14 AM
To: Xu, Qian Q ; Yuanhan Liu
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpd
om: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 9, 2016 3:03 AM
To: Xu, Qian Q
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Maxime Coquelin
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/7] vhost: add dequeue zero copy
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 02:37:27PM +0000, Xu, Qian Q wrote:
> this function copy_desc_to_m
See the bottom.
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yuanhan Liu
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 5:13 AM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Maxime Coquelin ; Yuanhan Liu
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/7] vhost: add dequeue zero copy
The basic idea of dequeue ze
Thx for the clarification. As to the naming, although it's a little confusing,
if people are fine with it, I'm fine.
-Original Message-
From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 6:02 PM
To: Xu, Qian Q
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Maxim
be a same number.
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Xu, Qian Q
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 5:00 PM
To: Yuanhan Liu; dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Maxime Coquelin
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/6] vhost: add a flag to enable Tx zero copy
Just curious
Just curious about the naming: vhost USER TX Zero copy. In fact, it's Vhost RX
zero-copy
For virtio, it's Virtio TX zero-copy. So, I wonder why we call it as Vhost TX
ZERO-COPY,
Any comments?
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yuanhan Liu
Sent: Tues
Lei
Could you list the test setup for below findings? I think we need at least to
check below tests for mergeable=on/off path:
1. Vhost/virtio loopback
2. PVP test : virtio-pmd IO fwd and virtio-net IPV4 fwd
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yao, Lei
essage-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Xu, Qian Q
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 4:33 PM
To: Yuanhan Liu ; dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Maxime Coquelin
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] vhost: add Tx zero copy support
I just ran a PVP test, nic receive packets then forwards to vhost PM
I just ran a PVP test, nic receive packets then forwards to vhost PMD, and
virtio user interface. I didn't see any performance gains in this scenario. All
packet size from 64B to 1518B
performance haven't got benefit from this patchset, and in fact, the
performance dropped a lot before 1280B, a
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Maxime Coquelin
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 3:19 PM
To: Yuanhan Liu
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/7] vhost: simplify features set/get
On 08/25/2016 05:03 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Wed,
OK, it's better to claim that his patchset have the dependency on another one.
-Original Message-
From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 3:40 PM
To: Xu, Qian Q
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Maxime Coquelin
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATC
I think you need also update vhost sample guide and vhost library in the
programmer guide for this release.
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yuanhan Liu
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 4:49 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Yuanhan Liu
Subject: [dpdk-dev]
I want to apply the patch on the latest DPDK, see below commit ID but failed
since no vhost.h and vhost-user.h files. So do you have any dependency on other
patches?
commit 28d8abaf250c3fb4dcb6416518f4c54b4ae67205
Author: Deirdre O'Connor
Date: Mon Aug 22 17:20:08 2016 +0100
doc: fix pa
.
Users may think it's a bug of R16.07 since R16.04 didn't check that. From my
view, crc-strip is not a "MUST" check for the port start. We can configure the
value after
the port start.
Any thoughts?
From: Yao, Lei A
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 9:36 AM
To: Topel, Bjorn
Cc: Xu, Qi
Tan, Jianfeng
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Wang, Zhihong ; Xu, Qian Q
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] examples/vhost: fix perf regression
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:42:45AM +, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
> We find significant perfermance drop introduced by below commit, when
> vhost example is started with --me
Tested-by: Qian Xu
- Test Commit: 8f6f24342281f59de0df7bd976a32f714d39b9a9
- OS/Kernel: Fedora 21/4.1.13
- GCC: gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 20141101 (Red Hat 4.9.2-1)
- CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2695 v4 @ 2.10
- NIC: Intel(R) Ethernet Controller X710 for 10GbE SFP+
- Total 2 cases, 2 passed, 0 failed.
T
My comments below.
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Tan, Jianfeng
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 10:44 AM
To: Yuanhan Liu
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Wang, Zhihong
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/vhost: fix perf regression
Hi Yuanhan,
On 7/20/2
Tested-by: Qian Xu
- Test Commit: 8f6f24342281f59de0df7bd976a32f714d39b9a9
- OS/Kernel: Fedora 21/4.1.13
- GCC: gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 20141101 (Red Hat 4.9.2-1)
- CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2695 v4 @ 2.10
- Total 1 cases, 1 passed, 0 failed.
1. The test scenario is Vhost-Virtio loopback without NIC
Do we need patch qemu for the reconnect case?
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yuanhan Liu
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2016 2:40 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Xie, Huawei; Yuanhan Liu
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] vhost: add vhost-user clie
: thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com; Mcnamara, John; Xu, Qian Q
Subject: [PATCH v2] doc: add section on tested platforms and nics
Add a new section on tested platforms and nics to the release notes.
Signed-off-by: Qian Xu
Signed-off-by: John McNamara
---
V2:
- Moved text to release notes.
- Made mailing list
tested nics and
platforms. Then how about putting them in one session of release notes?
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: Mcnamara, John
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 6:05 PM
To: Thomas Monjalon; Xu, Qian Q
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc:add tested platforms
Jianbo
Could you tell me the case that can reproduce the issue? We can help evaluate
the impact of performance on ixgbe, but I'm not sure how to check if your patch
really fix a problem because I don?t know how to reproduce the problem! Could
you first teach me on how to reproduce your issue? Or
Tested-by: Qian Xu
- Test Commit: 8f6f24342281f59de0df7bd976a32f714d39b9a9
- OS/Kernel: Fedora 21/4.1.13
- GCC: gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 20141101 (Red Hat 4.9.2-1)
- CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2695 v4 @ 2.10
- NIC: Intel(R) Ethernet Controller X710 for 10GbE SFP+
- Total 2 cases, 2 passed, 0 failed.
T
Marc
#Test1 is just a simple test. Just launch testpmd with these nic port.
./testpmd ?c 0x3 ?n 4 -- -i
Thanks
Qian
From: marc.sune at gmail.com [mailto:marc.s...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Marc
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 3:48 PM
To: Xu, Qian Q
Cc: Thomas Monjalon; Ananyev, Konstantin; Lu
several days.
Thanks
Qian
From: marc.sune at gmail.com [mailto:marc.s...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Marc
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 4:54 AM
To: Xu, Qian Q
Cc: Thomas Monjalon; Ananyev, Konstantin; Lu, Wenzhuo; Zhang, Helin;
Richardson, Bruce; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 0/8
It's a regression, vmxnet3 can work with dpdk2.2, but now it can't work well.
Yong,
Heng found that your patch may be the first one to break the function, could
you check it? Thx.
Thanks
Qian
From: Ding, HengX
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 11:28 AM
To: yongwang at vmware.com
Cc:
In fact, Masaru is the author, and I'm not sure how to detect a VWMARE E1000
device, anyone from vmware can check this? Thx.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monja...@6wind.com]
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 6:08 PM
To: Xu, Qian Q; Masaru OKI
Cc
We have tested with intel nic and found port can't be started for all
nics:ixgbe/i40e/igb/bonding, see attached mail for more details. Please check
and fix it.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
Sent: Wednesday, March 23
Tested-by: Qian Xu
- Test Commit: 8f6f24342281f59de0df7bd976a32f714d39b9a9
- OS/Kernel: Fedora 21/4.1.13
- GCC: gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 20141101 (Red Hat 4.9.2-1)
- CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2695 v4 @ 2.10
- NIC: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
- Target: Intel
Suggest to add document for why to have it, the basic usage and the sample of
how to use it.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zhe Tao
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 2:32 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2 v3] i40e:
What's your current firmware info, can u run ethtool -i port_interface to
check?
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Saurabh Mishra
Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2016 6:33 AM
To: dev at dpdk.org; users at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK i
If test the feature by testpmd, how to set the parameter? Need testpmd document
update also?
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zhe Tao
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 3:24 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] PATCH 1/2] i40e: supp
Any dependencies with kernel versions? What kernel versions should it support?
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ferruh Yigit
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 12:33 AM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] kdp: add virtual P
I have a quick check, VEB/VEPA/VSI is not i40e's specific, they are IEEE EVB
terms. See below.
IEEE EVB tutorial:
http://www.ieee802.org/802_tutorials/2009-11/evb-tutorial-draft-20091116_v09.pdf
Virtual Ethernet Bridge (VEB) - This is an IEEE EVB term. A VEB is a VLAN
Bridge internal to Fortv
tio1-->Virtio2-->Vhost-->NIC->ixia port. Check the
packet back at ixia port is content correct, no size change and payload change.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 12:36 PM
To: dev at dp
Does dpdk vhost-switch sample support virtio1.0? I tried it but seems not
working.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Tan, Jianfeng
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 7:19 PM
To: Yuanhan Liu; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH
Some virtio-pmd optimization performance data sharing:
1. Use simplified vhost-sample, only doing the dequeuer and free, so virtio
only tx, then test the virtio tx performance improvement. Then in the VM, using
one virtio to do the txonly, and let the virtio tx working. Also modified the
txonly
Tested-by: Qian Xu
- Test Commit: 6b6a94ee17d246a0078cc83257f522d0a6db5409
- OS/Kernel: Fedora 21/4.1.8
- GCC: gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 20141101 (Red Hat 4.9.2-1)
- CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
- NIC: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
- Target: Int
Frank,
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Liu, Jijiang
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 4:53 PM
To: Yuanhan Liu
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 7/8] virtio/lib:add virtio guest offload
capabili
m is correct.
Result: All the behavior is expected and cksum is correct. So the case is PASS.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Xu, Qian Q
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 6:45 PM
To: Thomas Monjalon
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Michael S. Tsi
vhost+ legacy virtio". So I'm afraid no customer would like to try
this case since the fake TSO and poor performance.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monja...@6wind.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 5:02 PM
To: Xu, Qian Q
Cc: Liu, Jijia
Tested-by: Qian Xu
- Test Commit: c4d404d7c1257465176deb5bb8c84e627d2d5eee
- OS/Kernel: Fedora 21/4.1.8
- GCC: gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 20141101 (Red Hat 4.9.2-1)
- CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
- NIC: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
- Target: Int
Sorry, correct the kernel info, my kernel version is 4.1.8-100.fc21.x86_64.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Xu, Qian Q
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 11:45 AM
To: Thomas Monjalon; Marcel Apfelbaum
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Michael S
DPDK GCC 64bit build on kernel 3.18 will be failed, could you help check?
== Build lib/librte_pipeline
/home/qxu10/virtio-opt-test/dpdk/lib/librte_vhost/virtio-net.c:81:106: error:
'VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1' undeclared here (not in a function)
static uint64_t VHOST_FEATURES = VHOST_SUPPORTED_FEATURES;
What's your NIC?
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of ???
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 9:29 AM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] I have a problem in setting up DPDK 2.1.0 in Fedora OS
release 20 (Heisenbug). I cannot r
Dear DPDK
Thomas
Thanks for the comments. See my comments inline below. Let me know if you have
objections, if no, I will send a v4 patch soon.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monja...@6wind.com]
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 10:11 PM
To: Xu, Qian Q
Cc
Tested-by: Qian Xu
Commit: c36a82f045ae362b76af4f2a53af10a2a4d2d20f
Test platform: HSW server
OS: Fedora 20
Kernel : 3.18
1. Bind 2ports to igb_uio
2. Run vmdq sample : ./examples/vmdq/build/vmdq_app -n 4 -c 0x1e -- -p 0x3
--nb-pools 63
3. Send 63 flows with different MAC/VLAN and see the output.
Thomas/John
Thanks a lot for your comments, and I will update the patch soon.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monja...@6wind.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 9:01 PM
To: Mcnamara, John
Cc: Xu, Qian Q; dev at dpdk.org; Jayakumar, Muthurajan
Thomas
Could you help check my doc patch, and let me know anything needed for the
merge? I think it would be very helpful for the users to get high performance
with step-by-step guide. Thx.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: Xu, Qian Q
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 11:20 AM
To
Thomas
Could you review the v2 performance doc and apply if no issues? Thanks.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: Xu, Qian Q
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 11:20 AM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Xu, Qian Q
Subject: [dpdk-dev][PATCH v2]doc:Add performance test guide about how to get
DPDK
Xiaozhou
So seems the performance bottleneck is not at the core, have you checked that
the Mellanox NIC's configuration? How many queues per port are you using? Could
you try l3fwd example with Mellanox to check if the performance is good enough?
I'm not familiar with Mellanox NIC, but if you ha
And this patch will be only related to exact match, the common usage of lpm is
not impacted.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of De Lara Guarch, Pablo
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 8:29 AM
To: Qiu, Michael; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk
Hi, Thomas and all
I saw in the latest rc1 package, the patch is not merged, and it's a critical
issue from validation view. I'm responsible for testing the dpdk vhost/virtio
features, and I found using the latest code, dpdk-vhost/dpdk-virtio can't RX/TX
package, then my 50% tests are failed whi
Bernard
Apply the patchset and run vhost-sample, both vhost-user and vhost-cuse, no
impact. Thx.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bernard Iremonger
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 9:51 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v
packet drops.
Thanks
Qian
-Original Message-
From: Wu, Jingjing
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 9:22 AM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Wu, Jingjing; Xu, Qian Q; Zhang, Helin
Subject: [PATCH] i40e: fix the VF rss issue when nb_rx_queue is less than
nb_tx_queue
From: "jingjing.wu"
I40e
Tested-by: Qian Xu
- Test Commit: b283164694b6ed18be1856b949e91a80371e44d4
- OS: Fedora 21
- GCC: gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 20141101 (Red Hat 4.9.2-1)
- CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
- NIC: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
- Target: Intel Corporatio
Tested-by: Qian Xu
- Test Commit: c55e94f560ef5c9fcee4584952de1d0bd414aece
- OS: Fedora 21
- GCC: gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 20141101 (Red Hat 4.9.2-1)
- CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
- NIC: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
- Target: Intel Corporation
Tested-by: Qian Xu
Signed-off-by: Qian Xu
-Tested commit: 1a1109404e702d3ad1ccc1033df55c59bec1f89a
-Host OS/Kernel: FC21/3.19
-Guest OS/Kernel: FC21/3.19
-NIC: Intel 82599 10G
-Default x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc configuration
-Total 2 cases, 2 passed.
Test Case 1: test_perf_vhost_one_vm_dpdk_fwd
Tested-by: Qian Xu
- Tested Commit: b67578ccdf45df9fd0f0204578b71acd854ca834
- OS: Fedora20 3.11
- GCC: gcc version 4.8.3 20140624
- CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz
- NIC: Intel 82599 Ethernet 10G SFI/SFP+ Network Connection
- Default x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc configuration
- Tota
Tested-by: Qian Xu
- Tested Commit: b67578ccdf45df9fd0f0204578b71acd854ca834
- OS: Fedora20 3.11
- GCC: gcc version 4.8.3 20140624
- CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz
- NIC: Intel 82599 Ethernet 10G SFI/SFP+ Network Connection
- Default x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc configuration
- Tota
rom: Zhang, Helin
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 9:41 AM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Cc: nhorman at tuxdriver.com; Xu, Qian Q; Cao, Waterman; Lu, Patrick; Liu,
Jijiang; Wu, Jingjing; Zhang, Helin
Subject: [PATCH v2] i40e: workaround for XL710 performance
On XL710, performance number is far from the expe
s the crash caused by changing
code or any other step?
What do you want for the vhost-user, changing the notification mechanism?
Thx. By the way, sth means something.
-Original Message-
From: Linhaifeng [mailto:haifeng@huawei.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2015 12:27 PM
To: Xu, Q
-
From: Linhaifeng [mailto:haifeng@huawei.com]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 12:02 PM
To: Xu, Qian Q; Xie, Huawei
Cc: lilijun; liuyongan at huawei.com; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: notify guest to fill buffer when there
is no buffer
On 2015/2/4 9:38, Xu, Qian
fore, send packet from
virtio1 to virtio2.
Pls let me know if any questions, issues.
-Original Message-
From: Linhaifeng [mailto:haifeng@huawei.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 5:19 PM
To: Xu, Qian Q; Xie, Huawei
Cc: lilijun; liuyongan at huawei.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhos
Haifeng
Could you give more information so that we can reproduce your issue? Thanks.
1. What's your dpdk package, based on which branch, with Huawei's vhost-user's
patches?
2. What's your step and command to launch vhost sample?
3. What is mz? Your internal tool? I can't yum install mz or downl
89 matches
Mail list logo
