Re: [dpdk-dev] rte_hash thread safe

choosing. Thanks, Jim On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 6:14 PM, Stephen Hemminger < step...@networkplumber.org> wrote: > On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 17:48:50 -0700 > Jim Murphy wrote: > > > Anecdotally I've heard that the urcu hash implementation is slower than > > rte_hash

Re: [dpdk-dev] rte_hash thread safe

17:21:15 -0700 > Jim Murphy wrote: > > > Has anyone seen performance data comparing rte_hash (perhaps with r/w > > locks) versus URCU hash? > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Stephen Hemminger < > > step...@networkplumber.org> wrote: > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] rte_hash thread safe

Has anyone seen performance data comparing rte_hash (perhaps with r/w locks) versus URCU hash? On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Stephen Hemminger < step...@networkplumber.org> wrote: > On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 12:40:41 -0700 > Brijesh Singh wrote: > > > A gentle reminder, > > > > I am curious to kno

Re: [dpdk-dev] Retire x86 32 bit?

Same for our case. On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Roger B Melton wrote: > On 4/17/18 4:46 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > >> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 13:01:14 -0700 >> Jim Murphy wrote: >> >> Still used in certain memory constrained environments. >>> >>

Re: [dpdk-dev] Retire x86 32 bit?

Still used in certain memory constrained environments. On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:39 AM, David Harton (dharton) wrote: > It is used and tested in production and non-production environments. > > Regards, > Dave > > > -Original Message- > > From: dev On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger > > Se

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/virtio-user: fix not working on 32-bit system

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Tan, Jianfeng wrote: > Hi Jim, > > > -Original Message- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jim Murphy > > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 6:24 AM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: [dpdk-dev]

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/virtio-user: fix not working on 32-bit system

Hi, The fix contained in this patch breaks under the following scenario: 1. A 64 bit host and virtual machine. Therefore all physical addresses are 64 bits. 2. A 32 bit user mode DPDK process running on a 64 bit virtual machine (64 bit kernel). In this case, the physical address is 64bits but th

[dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/4] Use Google Test as DPDK unit test framework

Hi, We are looking at using our existing test environment for our DPDK applications that will run on our build servers. Hughpages therefore is an issue. What is involved in running DPDK without hugepages? Thanks, Jim On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Ming Zhao(??) wrote: > googletest is a very