Same for our case. On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Roger B Melton <rmel...@cisco.com> wrote:
> On 4/17/18 4:46 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > >> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 13:01:14 -0700 >> Jim Murphy <jmur...@arista.com> wrote: >> >> Still used in certain memory constrained environments. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:39 AM, David Harton (dharton) < >>> dhar...@cisco.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> It is used and tested in production and non-production environments. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Dave >>>> >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 2:31 PM >>>>> To: dev@dpdk.org >>>>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] Retire x86 32 bit? >>>>> >>>>> I wonder if x86 32 bit is still useful? >>>>> Many distributions no longer support it, and not sure if it is tested >>>>> througly by anyone. >>>>> >>>>> Maybe time to deprecate it (gradually)? >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Pure 32 bit, or x86-64 instructions and registers used in 32 bit mode >> (which can be faster). >> . >> >> > Pure 32bit in our case. We do not use x32 ABI. > > -Roger > > >
