Hi Andrew,
Friday, September 29, 2017 10:26 AM, Andrew Rybchenko:
>On 09/28/2017 07:48 PM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote:
>>Add a new offload capability flag for Rx HW timestamp and enabling/disabling
>>this via rte_eth_rxmode.
>
>I think it should be on top [1] and ideally follow a new offload API wi
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 12:06:44PM , Jianfeng Tan wrote:
> +/* share callfd and kickfd */
> +params->type = VHOST_MSG_TYPE_SET_FDS;
> +vring_num = rte_vhost_get_vring_num(vid);
> +for (i = 0; i < vring_num; i++) {
> +if (r
On Thu, Sep 30, 2017 at 12:53:00PM +, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
>On 9/30/2017 4:23 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 01:55:59PM +, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
> >> +static int
> >> new_device(int vid)
> >> {
> >>struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev;
> >> @@ -610,6 +685,8 @@ new_device(in
On 9/30/2017 4:23 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 01:55:59PM +, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
+static int
new_device(int vid)
{
struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev;
@@ -610,6 +685,8 @@ new_device(int vid)
_rte_eth_dev_callback_process(eth_dev, RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_LSC,
On 9/30/2017 4:18 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 08:09:38AM +, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
Actually, the key (and typical) issue of multi-process here is the fds are
process specific, while they are stored in the shared memory. That means
only one will take effect eventually. Wors
On 9/30/2017 4:16 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 12:03:33PM +0800, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
+ if (rte_eal_mp_sendmsg("vhost pmd", params, sizeof(*params) + len,
To me, it's not a good idea to identify an object by a string. The common
practice is to use a handler, which coul
Hi Jianfeng,
Thank you for replying, I appreciate so much for this.
we are trying to run our dpdk application on AWS cloud which use xen
platform.
for this case, what should I do to support AWS cloud ?
Is there any way to do this ?
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Tan, Jianfeng
wrote:
> H
Hi Bill
On 9/30/2017 4:47 PM, Bill Bonaparte wrote:
Hi, everybody:
I am trying to run dpdk in xen guest, after trying dpdk17.05 without
success, I tried dpdk16.04 again. and it's sucessful to run testpmd this
time. but it can't receive any packets.
the command I used is :
./testpmd
Hi, everybody:
I am trying to run dpdk in xen guest, after trying dpdk17.05 without
success, I tried dpdk16.04 again. and it's sucessful to run testpmd this
time. but it can't receive any packets.
the command I used is :
./testpmd -l 1,2 -n 4 --vdev="eth_xenvirt0,mac=a6:38:57:e8:d5:be"
-
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 01:55:59PM +, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
> +static int
> new_device(int vid)
> {
> struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev;
> @@ -610,6 +685,8 @@ new_device(int vid)
> _rte_eth_dev_callback_process(eth_dev, RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_LSC,
> NULL, N
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 08:09:38AM +, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
> > Actually, the key (and typical) issue of multi-process here is the fds are
> > process specific, while they are stored in the shared memory. That means
> > only one will take effect eventually. Worse, the old ones are lost.
> >
> >
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 12:03:33PM +0800, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
> >>+ if (rte_eal_mp_sendmsg("vhost pmd", params, sizeof(*params) + len,
> >To me, it's not a good idea to identify an object by a string. The common
> >practice is to use a handler, which could either be a struct or a nubmer.
>
> My
Hi, everybody:
I can't wait to write this mail for help, I am trying to run dpdk on
xen guest (aka DomU), but whatevery I do, it's always failed.
The followings is my environment:
xen guest OS which dpdk is running on is ubuntu 16.04 sever. dpdk
version is 17.05.
I enable the x
13 matches
Mail list logo
