On Thu, Sep 30, 2017 at 12:53:00PM +0000, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
>On 9/30/2017 4:23 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 01:55:59PM +0000, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
> >> +static int
> >> new_device(int vid)
> >> {
> >> struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev;
> >> @@ -610,6 +685,8 @@ new_device(int vid)
> >> _rte_eth_dev_callback_process(eth_dev, RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_LSC,
> >> NULL, NULL);
> >>
> >> + share_device(vid);
> >> +
> > Another question is, have you considered/tested the case when the VM
> > changes the qeueue number later?
>
> Yes, that is a covered test case, we use ethtool to increase the
> combined queue number; see cover letter for detail.
Sorry I missed that!
However, I'm not quite sure I understood you:
Step 5: enable multi queue in VM1 and VM2.
$ ethtool -L ethX combined 2
Note in this test case, only queue 1, i.e., secondary process can process
packets. To use queue 1, basically, we can run command like:
$ taskset -c 1 <commands>
Do you mean the secondary can't rx/tx pkts from/to the 2nd queue?
And you are asking the user to add "taskset -c 1" each time he
wants to run a command inside the VM?
--yliu
