On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 12:49:51PM -0700, Matthew Hall wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 11:09:14AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > With email, the patches are right in front of developers and easier to quote
> > for review comments.
>
> Right in front of that subset of developers who do everyt
There's been a good discussion on the mailing list on the Beyond DPDK 2.0
thread. To supplement this, we'd like to have a community call for people to
air their views, and to help progress things towards a conclusion. It'll be an
open format, so people can bring up whatever issues they want, but
Hi,
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 12:45:12PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > - GitHub manages the patches via pull requests and can be easily seen
> > via a web browser.
> > - The down side is you do have to use a web browser to do some work, but
> > the bulk of the everyday work would be done as it i
On 5/1/15, 1:48 PM, "Neil Horman" wrote:
>On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 10:31:08AM -0700, Matthew Hall wrote:
>> On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 12:45:12PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
>> > Yes, but as you said above, using a web browser doesn't make
>>reviewing patches
>> > faster. In fact, I would assert tha
Hi Tim,
When were you thinking of having the call?
It's not been explicit, but can I assume that this call will also be
promoted among potential supporters of the project who may not be on
this list? I would be interested to get the perspective from the people
who are perhaps not developers who d
On 5/1/15, 1:09 PM, "Stephen Hemminger" wrote:
>On Fri, 1 May 2015 15:56:32 +
>"Wiles, Keith" wrote:
>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I believe the DPDK community would benefit from moving to GitHub as the
>> primary DPDK site. http://github.com
>>
>> I believe the DPDK community can benefit from
On 5/1/15, 11:45 AM, "Neil Horman" wrote:
>On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 03:56:32PM +, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I believe the DPDK community would benefit from moving to GitHub as the
>> primary DPDK site. http://github.com
>>
>I'm not explicitly opposed to this, but I'm having
On 5/1/15, 12:31 PM, "Matthew Hall" wrote:
>Normally I'm a big command-line supporter. However I have found reviewing
>patches by email for me is about the most painful workflow.
>
>The emails are pages and pages.
>
>The replies from commenters are buried in the walls of text.
>
>Replies to rep
This patch depends on the Port Hotplug Framework.
It implements the eth_dev_uninit_t() function for virtio pmd.
Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger
---
lib/librte_pmd_virtio/virtio_ethdev.c | 39 -
1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib
Go through the linuxapp eal code and cleanup whitespace
issues reported by checkpatch.
---
lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_alarm.c | 17 ++--
lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_debug.c | 2 +-
lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_hugepage_info.c | 57 ++---
lib/librte_eal/linux
Hi Everyone,
I believe the DPDK community would benefit from moving to GitHub as the
primary DPDK site. http://github.com
I believe the DPDK community can benefit from being at a very well know
world wide site. GitHub seems to have the most eyes of any of the open
source Git repos today and it ap
This patch depends on the Port Hotplug Framework.
It implements the rte_dev_uninit_t() function for the link bonding pmd.
Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger
---
lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond.h | 13 -
lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_api.c | 84
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 10:31:08AM -0700, Matthew Hall wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 12:45:12PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > Yes, but as you said above, using a web browser doesn't make reviewing
> > patches
> > faster. In fact, I would assert that it slows the process down, as it
> > preven
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 10:59:32PM +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> Projects like GCC, GLIBC, binutils, busybox, etc or what?
>
> A.
You'll notice all of these are low-level UNIX hacker sorts of tools mostly,
with the partial exception of busybox. But even that is mainly for embedded
use. It doesn
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 11:09:14AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> With email, the patches are right in front of developers and easier to quote
> for review comments.
Right in front of that subset of developers who do everything kernel-style,
perhaps yes. But this sort of workflow is in the min
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 03:56:32PM +, Wiles, Keith wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I believe the DPDK community would benefit from moving to GitHub as the
> primary DPDK site. http://github.com
>
I'm not explicitly opposed to this, but I'm having trouble matching up the
technical and governance iss
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 03:36:19PM +0100, Bernard Iremonger wrote:
> This patch depends on the Port Hotplug Framework.
> It implements the rte_dev_uninit_t() function for the link bonding pmd.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger
> ---
> lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond.h | 13 -
>
On Fri, 1 May 2015 15:56:32 +
"Wiles, Keith" wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I believe the DPDK community would benefit from moving to GitHub as the
> primary DPDK site. http://github.com
>
> I believe the DPDK community can benefit from being at a very well know
> world wide site. GitHub seems t
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 12:45:12PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> Yes, but as you said above, using a web browser doesn't make reviewing patches
> faster. In fact, I would assert that it slows the process down, as it
> prevents
> quick, easy command line access to patch review (as you have with a pr
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 05:26:57PM +0100, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>
>
> On 4/30/15, 11:24 AM, "Richardson, Bruce"
> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 02:55:47PM +, Wiles, Keith wrote:
> >> What is the NO_AUTOLIB variable used for anyway, the doc states this:
> >>
> >>
> >> * NO_AUTOLIBS: If
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 05:33:36PM +0100, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>
>
> On 4/30/15, 11:22 AM, "Richardson, Bruce"
> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 02:31:13PM +, Wiles, Keith wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 4/30/15, 8:38 AM, "Olivier MATZ" wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hi Keith,
> >> >
> >> >On 04/30/2015
NO_AUTOLIBS is not required as it was not used or defined in the config files.
Signed-off-by: Keith Wiles
---
mk/rte.app.mk | 5 -
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mk/rte.app.mk b/mk/rte.app.mk
index b8030d2..b63e346 100644
--- a/mk/rte.app.mk
+++ b/mk/rte.app.mk
@@ -54,11 +54,8
Removed the LDLIBS-y reference as it is not required.
Signed-off-by: Keith Wiles
---
doc/build-sdk-quick.txt | 1 +
doc/guides/prog_guide/build_app.rst | 2 +-
doc/guides/prog_guide/dev_kit_build_system.rst | 2 ++
doc/guides/prog_guide/dev_kit_root_make_h
Trying to simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk to make the code
more readable and maintainable by moving LDLIBS variable to use
the same style as LDLIBS-y being used in the rest of the code.
Added a new variable called EXTRA_LDLIBS to be used by example apps
instead of using LDLIBS directly. The new
24 matches
Mail list logo
