Re: Vote for apache doris 1.1.2

2022-09-12 Thread stalary
+1 I checked: [x] Whether the download link is legitimate. [x] Whether the checksum and PGP signature are legitimate. 3. [x] Whether the code matches the current release. [x] Whether the LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct. [x] All files carry the necessary protocol descriptions. by stalary O

Re: Vote for apache doris 1.1.2

2022-09-12 Thread junling du
please check the merge conflict in unit test file: .//be/test/olap/delta_writer_test.cpp:*<<< HEAD* De Li 于2022年9月13日周二 10:32写道: > Updated the checking result as following in last email which is incorrect. > > # docker run -it --rm -v $(pwd):/github/workspace apache/skywalking-eyes > head

Re: Vote for apache doris 1.1.2

2022-09-12 Thread De Li
Updated the checking result as following in last email which is incorrect. # docker run -it --rm -v $(pwd):/github/workspace apache/skywalking-eyes header check INFO GITHUB_TOKEN is not set, license-eye won't comment on the pull request INFO Loading configuration from file: .licenserc.yaml INF

Re: Vote for apache doris 1.1.2

2022-09-12 Thread De Li
Here is my +1(binding), I checked: [x] Checksum and PGP signature are legitimate. [x] DISCLAIMER is included. [x] The source code matches the current release. [x] No compiled content is included in the source package. [x] The compilation can be executed without problems. --- # wget https://dis

Re: Vote for apache doris 1.1.2

2022-09-09 Thread Jiafeng.Zhang
+1 (binding) I checked: [x] Whether the download link is legitimate. [x] Whether the checksum and PGP signature are legitimate. 3. [x] Whether the code matches the current release. [x] Whether the LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct. [x] All files carry the necessary protocol descriptions.