+1
I checked:
[x] Whether the download link is legitimate.
[x] Whether the checksum and PGP signature are legitimate. 3.
[x] Whether the code matches the current release.
[x] Whether the LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct.
[x] All files carry the necessary protocol descriptions.
by stalary
O
Hi Junling,
The unit test code in 1.1.2 branch is not up-to-date.
We do not recommend that users compile or run unit tests on the release branch.
Please run unit test on master branch.
This issue does not affect the compilation and running of the main code, we
will fix this issue in the next relea
please check the merge conflict in unit test file:
.//be/test/olap/delta_writer_test.cpp:*<<< HEAD*
De Li 于2022年9月13日周二 10:32写道：
> Updated the checking result as following in last email which is incorrect.
>
> # docker run -it --rm -v $(pwd):/github/workspace apache/skywalking-eyes
> head
Updated the checking result as following in last email which is incorrect.
# docker run -it --rm -v $(pwd):/github/workspace apache/skywalking-eyes header
check
INFO GITHUB_TOKEN is not set, license-eye won't comment on the pull request
INFO Loading configuration from file: .licenserc.yaml
INF
Here is my +1(binding),
I checked:
[x] Checksum and PGP signature are legitimate.
[x] DISCLAIMER is included.
[x] The source code matches the current release.
[x] No compiled content is included in the source package.
[x] The compilation can be executed without problems.
---
# wget
https://dis
Hi all,
I plan to refactor the current framework of scan node, the details can be found
here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DORIS/DSIP-022%3A+Refactor+Scan+Node
Please feel free to discuss.
--
此致！Best Regards
陈明雨 Mingyu Chen
Email:
morning...@apache.org
+1 binding
I checked:
[x] The download link is legal.
[x] The PGP signature are valid.
[x] The source code matches the current release version.
[x] The LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct.
[x] All files carry the necessary protocol header.
[x] The compiled content is not included in the source p
