The vote has now been open for more than seven days and we have seven +1 votes
(three binding) so the vote passes.
Thank you all.
The next step will be to start the IP clearance process.
I will start a separate email thread for this.
Thanks,
Andy.
> On Jul 14, 2024, at 10:48 PM, Renjie Liu
> On Jul 16, 2024, at 1:15 PM, Andy Grove wrote:
>
> The vote has now been open for more than seven days and we have seven +1
> votes (three binding) so the vote passes.
>
> Thank you all.
>
> The next step will be to start the IP clearance process.
>
> I will start a separate email thread
+1, non-binding.
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:07 AM Mehmet Ozan Kabak wrote:
> +1
>
> > On Jul 14, 2024, at 7:55 PM, tison wrote:
> >
> > +1 non-binding
> >
> > LGTM
> >
> > Best,
> > tison.
> >
> >
> > Edmondo Porcu 于2024年7月14日 周日08:31写道：
> >
> >> +1 (non-binding)
> >>
> >>
> >> I was starting t
+1
> On Jul 14, 2024, at 7:55 PM, tison wrote:
>
> +1 non-binding
>
> LGTM
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
>
> Edmondo Porcu 于2024年7月14日 周日08:31写道：
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>>
>> I was starting to work on a contribution to make it possible to produce
>> indented SQL using `unparser(expr).to_string()
+1 non-binding
LGTM
Best,
tison.
Edmondo Porcu 于2024年7月14日 周日08:31写道：
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> I was starting to work on a contribution to make it possible to produce
> indented SQL using `unparser(expr).to_string()` and I realized that
> `ast::Statement` lives in sql-parser. I think keeping
+1 (non-binding)
I was starting to work on a contribution to make it possible to produce
indented SQL using `unparser(expr).to_string()` and I realized that
`ast::Statement` lives in sql-parser. I think keeping the SQL parsing code
under the Datafusion umbrella could help development of features
of sqlparser-rs project
+1
As for the new initial committers, at the moment there is only one active
maintainer with write access (myself). However, there are three active
maintainers[1] of sqlparser whom we had discussed granting commit rights
to.
My hope would be that if we proceed and continue
+1
As for the new initial committers, at the moment there is only one active
maintainer with write access (myself). However, there are three active
maintainers[1] of sqlparser whom we had discussed granting commit rights
to.
My hope would be that if we proceed and continue sqlparser-rs developmen
Generally sounds good especially considering the tight collaborations.
One question here: Are there new initial committers except those who are
already a DataFusion committer that will be nominated?
I remember that the IP clearance process can contain this section.
Best,
tison.
Andy Grove 于20
Hi,
We have been discussing moving the sqlparser-rs project [1] under ASF
governance for some time now.
The conversation started within the Apache Arrow project before DataFusion
became a top-level project [2].
There is also a discussion within the sqlparser-rs community [3].
Feedback so far
10 matches
Mail list logo
