+1

As for the new initial committers, at the moment there is only one active
maintainer with write access (myself). However, there are three active
maintainers[1] of sqlparser whom we had discussed granting commit rights
to.

My hope would be that if we proceed and continue sqlparser-rs development
as part of the DataFusion project one or more of them would be invited to
become committers of DataFusion.

Andrew

[1]: https://github.com/sqlparser-rs/sqlparser-rs/issues/1243


On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 6:13 PM tison <wander4...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Generally sounds good especially considering the tight collaborations.
>
> One question here: Are there new initial committers except those who are
> already a DataFusion committer that will be nominated?
>
> I remember that the IP clearance process can contain this section.
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
>
> Andy Grove <andy.gr...@apple.com.invalid> 于2024年7月8日周一 15:09写道:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have been discussing moving the sqlparser-rs project [1] under ASF
> > governance for some time now.
> >
> > The conversation started within the Apache Arrow project before
> DataFusion
> > became a top-level project [2].
> >
> > There is also a discussion within the sqlparser-rs community [3].
> >
> > Feedback so far seems positive overall.
> >
> > I believe that it is now time to move to a formal vote on this within the
> > Apache DataFusion project.
> >
> > If the vote passes, the PMC and the sqlparser-rs community will work
> > together to complete the ASF IP clearance process and push the contents
> of
> > the existing sqlparser/sqlparser-rs repository into a new
> > apache/datafusion-sqlparser repository.
> >
> > [ ] + 1 : Accept contribution of sqlparser-rs repository
> > [ ] 0 : No opinion
> > [ ] -1 : Reject contribution because ….
> >
> > Here is my vote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Andy.
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/sqlparser-rs/sqlparser-rs
> >
> > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/q80j49poyg99x2c01900312qz7ps9wgp
> >
> > [3] https://github.com/sqlparser-rs/sqlparser-rs/issues/1294
>

Reply via email to