There is some good discussion on the ticket -- specifically maybe it makes
sense to split out the actual orc->arrow code from the DataFusion
integration
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 10:46 AM Hao Ding wrote:
> +1 non-binding for the donation
>
> However, I have some other thoughts about the destinatio
+1 non-binding for the donation
However, I have some other thoughts about the destination.
>From my perspective as a passerby, `datafusion-orc` seems more like Datafusion
>integration rather than focusing solely on the ORC format. I'm a bit worried
>that this might reduce the likelihood of pote
+1
I also think it's suitable to donate this repo to Datafusion
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 9:49 PM Wayne Xia wrote:
> Hi!
>
> There is an ongoing discussion[1] about
> donating datafusion-contrib/datafusion-orc[2] to one of
> Apache ORC, Apache Arrow or Apache Datafusion.
>
> This repo has been mo
Hi!
There is an ongoing discussion[1] about
donating datafusion-contrib/datafusion-orc[2] to one of
Apache ORC, Apache Arrow or Apache Datafusion.
This repo has been moved into datafusion-contrib organization for more than
one year and
receives continuous contributions from more than three differ