There is some good discussion on the ticket -- specifically maybe it makes
sense to split out the actual orc->arrow code from the DataFusion
integration

On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 10:46 AM Hao Ding <xua...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 non-binding for the donation
>
> However, I have some other thoughts about the destination.
>
> From my perspective as a passerby, `datafusion-orc` seems more like
> Datafusion integration rather than focusing solely on the ORC format. I'm a
> bit worried that this might reduce the likelihood of potential users or
> contributors finding us.
>
> We have three options so far:
>
> - apache/orc-rust
> - apache/arrow-rs/orc
> - apache/datafusion-orc
>
> Which option do you think is best for orc project?
>
> On 2024/08/14 13:48:04 Wayne Xia wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > There is an ongoing discussion[1] about
> > donating datafusion-contrib/datafusion-orc[2] to one of
> > Apache ORC, Apache Arrow or Apache Datafusion.
> >
> > This repo has been moved into datafusion-contrib organization for more
> than
> > one year and
> > receives continuous contributions from more than three different
> > affiliates[3]. I think it's suitable to
> > donate this repo to the Apache.
> >
> > Please leave your comments on the ticket if you would like to participate
> > in the discussion.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ruihang
> >
> > [1]: https://github.com/datafusion-contrib/datafusion-orc/issues/120
> > [2]: https://github.com/datafusion-contrib/datafusion-orc
> > [3]:
> > https://github.com/datafusion-contrib/datafusion-orc/graphs/contributors
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@datafusion.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to