Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.11/2.4.8/2.5.4/2.6.1

+1 On 05/30/2012 08:15 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.6.0 was released. We've back ported > over 70 of them to 2.5.4 and 40 to 2.4.8 and 25 to 2.3.11. > > > List of issues: > 2.3.11: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.11/2.4.8/2.5.4/2.6.1

+1 Cheers, Sergey On 30/05/12 19:15, Daniel Kulp wrote: We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.6.0 was released. We've back ported over 70 of them to 2.5.4 and 40 to 2.4.8 and 25 to 2.3.11. List of issues: 2.3.11: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310511&vers

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.11/2.4.8/2.5.4/2.6.1

+1 David On 30 May 2012 19:15, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.6.0 was released. We've back ported > over 70 of them to 2.5.4 and 40 to 2.4.8 and 25 to 2.3.11. > > > List of issues: > 2.3.11: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=123105

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.11/2.4.8/2.5.4/2.6.1

+1 - Dennis On 05/31/2012 06:15 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.6.0 was released. We've back ported over 70 of them to 2.5.4 and 40 to 2.4.8 and 25 to 2.3.11. List of issues: 2.3.11: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310511&ver

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.11/2.4.8/2.5.4/2.6.1

+1. Colm. On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Dennis Sosnoski wrote: > +1 > > - Dennis > > > > On 05/31/2012 06:15 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> >> We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.6.0 was released. We've back ported >> over 70 of them to 2.5.4 and 40 to 2.4.8 and 25 to 2.3.11. >> >> >> List o

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.11/2.4.8/2.5.4/2.6.1

+1, -- Ulhas Bhole On 30 May 2012, at 19:15, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.6.0 was released. We've back ported > over 70 of them to 2.5.4 and 40 to 2.4.8 and 25 to 2.3.11. > > > List of issues: > 2.3.11: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.j

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.11/2.4.8/2.5.4/2.6.1

+1 Christian Am 30.05.2012 20:15, schrieb Daniel Kulp: We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.6.0 was released. We've back ported over 70 of them to 2.5.4 and 40 to 2.4.8 and 25 to 2.3.11. List of issues: 2.3.11: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310511&versio

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.11/2.4.8/2.5.4/2.6.1

+1 On May 31, 2012, at 5:05 AM, Christian Schneider wrote: > +1 > > Christian > > Am 30.05.2012 20:15, schrieb Daniel Kulp: >> >> We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.6.0 was released. We've back ported >> over 70 of them to 2.5.4 and 40 to 2.4.8 and 25 to 2.3.11. >> >> >> List of issues:

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.11/2.4.8/2.5.4/2.6.1

+1 Aki 2012/5/30 Daniel Kulp : > > > We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.6.0 was released. We've back ported > over 70 of them to 2.5.4 and 40 to 2.4.8 and 25 to 2.3.11. > > > List of issues: > 2.3.11: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310511&version=12320749

RE: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.11/2.4.8/2.5.4/2.6.1

+1 (non binding) From: Aki Yoshida [elak...@googlemail.com] Sent: 31 May 2012 22:57 To: dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.11/2.4.8/2.5.4/2.6.1 +1 Aki 2012/5/30 Daniel Kulp : > > > We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.6.0 was release

RE: Active Profile Problem with Apache CXF and ADFS2.0(STS)

Hi Gina Add an empty wsp:Policy element as a child to sp:HttpsToken: There was a fix in CXF to be spec compliant. HTH -- Oliver Wulff Blog: http://owulff.blogspot.com Solution Architect http://coders.talend.com Talend Application

Fediz release

Hi guys I'd like to get the first release out of Fediz within the next two weeks. There are a few features missing which should get in next week like: - Custom token support - Publish WS-Federation Metadata document What else has to be completed before we can release it? One question from my si

Re: Fediz release

Hi, just a very small detail about samples but files like http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/fediz/trunk/examples/wsclientWebapp/webapp/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/beans.xml should be avoided. WEB

RE: Active Profile Problem with Apache CXF and ADFS2.0(STS)

Hi Gina The fix was that CXF complains if this element is missing. Another option is that you download this wsdl, fix the incorrect policy definition and reference the local wsdl file in the STSClient bean. Thanks Oli -- Oliver Wulff Blog: http://owulff.blogspot.com

Re: Active Profile Problem with Apache CXF and ADFS2.0(STS)

Hi Oliver, So, it sounds like that first option wouldn't work for me since it is adding more complaining(more sensitive). :) For the second option, are you suggesting that changing From: To: for each occurrence of the element? On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Oliver Wulff wrote: > Hi Gina

Re: Active Profile Problem with Apache CXF and ADFS2.0(STS)

Hi Oliver, only appears in ADFS2.0 wsdl file like bellow, but I don't think that can modify ADFS2.0 wsdl file. It came from Microsoft as it is. is child of here. You have mentioned that there is a fix from CXF. I am using CXF 2.6.0. Do you have newer version available? Gina On Thu, May 3

Re: Active Profile Problem with Apache CXF and ADFS2.0(STS)

After I added an empty as child element of , now I am seeing new complaing - 'sp:KeyValueToken/wsp:Policy must have a value'. WARNING: No assertion builder for type { http://schemas.microsoft.com/ws/06/2004/policy/http}NegotiateAuthenticationregistered. May 31, 2012 6:34:25 PM org.apache.cxf.ws.p

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.11/2.4.8/2.5.4/2.6.1

Found some example pom still use SNAPSHOT for 2.5.3 ./jax_rs/minimal_osgi/pom.xml: 2.5.3-SNAPSHOT ./jax_rs/minimal_osgi/pom.xml: 2.5.3-SNAPSHOT ./jax_rs/minimal_osgi/pom.xml: 2.5.3-SNAPSHOT for 2.6.1 ./samples/jax_rs/minimal_osgi/pom.xml: 2.6.0-SNAPSHOT ./samples/jax_rs/mi