2011/9/2 Dennis Sosnoski :
> On 09/01/2011 09:15 PM, Aki Yoshida wrote:
>> As Dennis says in his reply, the RM spec doesn't talk about this
>> transportation binding specific part. The reason, I suppose, is that
>> this is implicitly covered by the normal WS BP profile that recommends
>> the use of
On Friday, September 02, 2011 10:41:56 AM Aki Yoshida wrote:
> Thanks. I looked at some examples of Axis2 and the new behavior can
> interoperate with them. But I noticed one thing in the create sequence
> behavior for a decoupled endpoint case.
Oh... cool... can I assign CXF-372 to you. :-)
S
2011/9/2 Daniel Kulp :
> On Friday, September 02, 2011 10:41:56 AM Aki Yoshida wrote:
>> Thanks. I looked at some examples of Axis2 and the new behavior can
>> interoperate with them. But I noticed one thing in the create sequence
>> behavior for a decoupled endpoint case.
>
> Oh... cool... can I
On Thursday, September 01, 2011 1:25:40 AM hamlax wrote:
> now the problem is to get all the cxf dependencies wrapped as bundles and
> punched into the rcp target platform ... this is harder than it seems ... i
> found the DOSGi distribution of cxf, but for some reason this does not help
> either.
On Friday, September 02, 2011 5:50:36 PM Aki Yoshida wrote:
> 2011/9/2 Daniel Kulp :
> > On Friday, September 02, 2011 10:41:56 AM Aki Yoshida wrote:
> >> Thanks. I looked at some examples of Axis2 and the new behavior can
> >> interoperate with them. But I noticed one thing in the create sequence
On Thursday, September 01, 2011 10:53:04 PM Amine El idrissi wrote:
> I get an error message when i run the class "SimpleService_P1_Client" after
> running in the class "SimpleService_P1_Service". The error message is showed
> in the attached image file. the wsdl file i use is also attached.
> so h
