On Friday, September 02, 2011 5:50:36 PM Aki Yoshida wrote:
> 2011/9/2 Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>:
> > On Friday, September 02, 2011 10:41:56 AM Aki Yoshida wrote:
> >> Thanks. I looked at some examples of Axis2 and the new behavior can
> >> interoperate with them. But I noticed one thing in the create sequence
> >> behavior for a decoupled endpoint case.
> > 
> > Oh... cool...  can I assign CXF-372 to you.   :-)
> > 
> > Seriously, CXF-371, CXF-372, and CXF-373 really seem kind of "bogus" to
> > me and I was thinking of just closing them.  If a user encounters an
> > issue that we find to be a bug, we can log the bug.
> 
> If it's not in hurry, I can take them and see what we can do.

I'm not in any hurry.  They've been there for 5 years.   What's a little 
longer?   :-)

Dan


> 
> There used to be some public endpoints some years ago. But there seems
> to be public endpoints nor some standard interop test cases. So, I
> don't know how far we want to go in this interop stuff. Besides, those
> tests based on some public endpoints are very subjective to the
> technical environment and we can't integrate them in our build
> process.
> 
> So, what I was thinking about regarding the interop tests is to make
> some mocked conduit for CXF to intercept and compare the CXF's
> outgoing requests against the previously recorded CXF's expected
> requests and extract some properties, then to feed back the recorded
> non-CXF's incoming responses to the CXF's response channel and
> possibly to the decoupled channel if configured.
> 
> The recorded messages that are fed back to the CXF endpoints are
> parameterized and enhanced with the runtime per-message properties
> that are extracted during the request processing so that they look
> like the expected response messages.
> 
> |f we go this way, we can at least say that we have some automatic
> 
> interop tests for Axis2 1.6.0 etc without using the actual systems
> during the tests.
> 
> 
> regards, aki
> 
> > Dan
> > 
> >> Axis2 sets replyTo to the anonymous address so that the
> >> CreateSequenceResponse comes back directly in the HTTP response,
> >> whereas all the other responses come back to the decoupled endpoint.
> >> In contrast, CXF sets replyTo to  the decoupled endpoint so that the
> >> create sequence response also comes back to the decoupled endpoint.
> >> Although they interoperate each other, I think it would be nice to
> >> provide a configuration option in CXF to also set replyTo to the
> >> anonymous address for the create sequence. How do you think?
> >> 
> >> This can be a configuration property somewhere in the manager or
> >> sorcePolicy or a request context property. If it goes to the
> >> configuration, I don't exactly where we should put it. I saw you
> >> started to work on the manager config for the version switching
> >> feature. Maybe, you can tell me where you would put it.
> >> 
> >> Thanks.
> >> 
> >> regards, aki
> >> 
> >> >  - Dennis
> > 
> > --
> > Daniel Kulp
> > dk...@apache.org
> > http://dankulp.com/blog
> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
-- 
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to