I just wanted to let everyone know about Dennis' latest article at IBM
DeveloperWorks:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jws19/index.html?ca=drs
It's another well done article comparing CXF, Metro, and Axis2.
I won't spoil it, but I just want to say "well done" to the entire
Fantastic ;-) Kudos to everyone.
Jeff
On Dec 8, 2010, at 5:55 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> I just wanted to let everyone know about Dennis' latest article at IBM
> DeveloperWorks:
>
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jws19/index.html?ca=drs
>
> It's another well done article c
That's great, his last article was very helpful at my last contract in saving
me from implementing using "Web Services Pack for WAS" (aka Axis)
Craig.
On 2010-12-08, at 7:33 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
> Fantastic ;-) Kudos to everyone.
>
> Jeff
>
> On Dec 8, 2010, at 5:55 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 14:40, Craig Tataryn wrote:
> That's great, his last article was very helpful at my last contract in saving
> me from implementing using "Web Services Pack for WAS" (aka Axis)
Interesting statement. Dennis' last articles were all about comparison
between CXF, Rampart and M
I was especially impressed that you got the fixes to the problems from
the last article into the 2.3.1 release (which I tested yesterday and
added to the text). :-) You and the whole team are doing a great job on
CXF, and I hope to get the chance to personally contribute to the
project in the futu
On 12/09/2010 08:53 AM, Andreas Veithen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 14:40, Craig Tataryn wrote:
>
>> That's great, his last article was very helpful at my last contract in
>> saving me from implementing using "Web Services Pack for WAS" (aka Axis)
>>
> Interesting statement. Dennis' l
We were using WAS 6.1 and we needed to support HL7 payloads. Axis wasn't up to
snuff. Then trying to get modern versions of JAXB and XML APIs to work with WAS
wasted soo much time and money. It was also a main contributor to my hair
greying at the tender age of 34.
Craig.
On 2010-12-08,
Just be thankful you have hair to get gray. :)
On 12/08/2010 03:26 PM, Craig Tataryn wrote:
We were using WAS 6.1 and we needed to support HL7 payloads. Axis wasn't up to
snuff. Then trying to get modern versions of JAXB and XML APIs to work with WAS
wasted soo much time and money. It w
Looks like you made the same mistake that I've seen elsewhere: instead
of just installing the Web services feature pack on WAS 6.1 (to get
JAX-WS support) and let the IBM support take care of the issues (after
all that is what they are payed for), you spent your time trying to
integrate another SOA
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 21:15, Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
> On 12/09/2010 08:53 AM, Andreas Veithen wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 14:40, Craig Tataryn wrote:
>>
>>> That's great, his last article was very helpful at my last contract in
>>> saving me from implementing using "Web Services Pack for W
On 2010-12-08, at 3:33 PM, Andreas Veithen wrote:
> Looks like you made the same mistake that I've seen elsewhere: instead
> of just installing the Web services feature pack on WAS 6.1 (to get
> JAX-WS support) and let the IBM support take care of the issues (after
> all that is what they are pay
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 22:58, Craig Tataryn wrote:
>
> On 2010-12-08, at 3:33 PM, Andreas Veithen wrote:
>
>> Looks like you made the same mistake that I've seen elsewhere: instead
>> of just installing the Web services feature pack on WAS 6.1 (to get
>> JAX-WS support) and let the IBM support tak
AS WAS 6.1 is built on Axis2, perhaps this thread would be better moved
to the Axis2 Dev list.
Glen
On 12/08/2010 06:29 PM, Andreas Veithen wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 22:58, Craig Tataryn wrote:
On 2010-12-08, at 3:33 PM, Andreas Veithen wrote:
Looks like you made the same mis
The discussion has actually nothing to do with either CXF or Axis2
(nor with Dennis' article). I just hate it when people make misleading
statements.
Andreas
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 00:35, Glen Mazza wrote:
> AS WAS 6.1 is built on Axis2, perhaps this thread would be better moved to
> the Axis2 D
+1 ;-) CXF rocks and thats it! ;-)
Jeff
On Dec 8, 2010, at 4:35 PM, Glen Mazza wrote:
> AS WAS 6.1 is built on Axis2, perhaps this thread would be better moved to
> the Axis2 Dev list.
>
> Glen
>
> On 12/08/2010 06:29 PM, Andreas Veithen wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 22:58, Craig Tataryn
Andreas,
Honestly... its not misleading... this discussion really should be taken
offline and go direct. There are people who like WAS and people who absolutely
hate it. It can be argued all day about the merits of WAS and how great or
sucky it is but probably not here. Just my .02. I w
> I just hate it when people make misleading statements.
BTW, I apply the same standards to my fellow Axis2 developers [1],
just in case somebody thinks that I'm trying to promote a particular
SOAP stack here. I think that Dennis can confirm that.
[1] http://markmail.org/message/hpalcmeiy3ncwrkg
Admittedly that thread was more entertaining.
On Dec 8, 2010, at 4:56 PM, Andreas Veithen wrote:
>> I just hate it when people make misleading statements.
>
> BTW, I apply the same standards to my fellow Axis2 developers [1],
> just in case somebody thinks that I'm trying to promote a particular
On 12/09/2010 04:18 PM, Johan Edstrom wrote:
> Admittedly that thread was more entertaining.
>
:-)Well, you won't see me discussing this most recent article on the
Axis2 list.
And yes, I've found Andreas to be very fair in his assessments and
against misleading people, even when the mislea
In the current jdk15 build the ServerPersistenceTest failed:
https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/A-F/view/CXF/job/CXF-Trunk-JDK15/org.apache.cxf.systests$cxf-systests-ws-specs/1550/testReport/org.apache.cxf.systest.ws.rm/ServerPersistenceTest/testRecovery/
In this build it could have to do with
20 matches
Mail list logo
