Hi Christian
Perfect - thanks for taking care of it.
Cheers, Sergey
Hi Sergey,
I have simply added the locale. It works for me now:
Date serverDate = new SimpleDateFormat("EEE, dd MMM HH:mm:ss zzz",
Locale.ENGLISH)
.parse("Sun, 29 Oct 1994 19:43:31 GMT");
Greetings
Chri
Thanks David,
Just applied the patch.
Cheers,
Eoghan
David Bosschaert wrote:
Hi all,
I've attached a patch that implements the first part of
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1836 to this bug.
New unit tests are included too.
Would greatly appreciate if someone could apply the pat
Hi all,
I've attached a patch with the implementation of the
DistributionProvider.getRemoteServices() API to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1836
New unit tests included too.
Small changes - frequent commits :) If larger patches are preferred, let
me know!
Thanks,
David
---
Now applied, thanks ...
/Eoghan
David Bosschaert wrote:
Hi all,
I've attached a patch with the implementation of the
DistributionProvider.getRemoteServices() API to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1836
New unit tests included too.
Small changes - frequent commits :) If larger pa
Hi Benson,
Thanks for checking this out. Just to clarify, do you think the test
should be checking that its an instance of StringType in both places, or do
you think the wrong type is being returned (i.e. it should be a
CustomStringType in both cases)?
Cheers,
Peter
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 05:
The annotation seems to me to call for the custom type both times.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Peter Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Benson,
>
> Thanks for checking this out. Just to clarify, do you think the test
> should be checking that its an instance of StringType in both places
We're rappidly approaching time to do the 2.0.9 and 2.1.3 releases.
It's been about 10 week since 2.0.9 and 7 weeks since 2.1.2. We have
33 issues resolved for 2.0.9, and 38 for 2.1.3. Thus, we probably
should consider doing some releases shortly.
HOWEVER, my hard drive crashed this week
Given Dan's message today to a user, I want to toss out the possibility of
deprecating the entire Simple front end.
I'm passionately neutral. Few things are more deep-felt than my vote of zero
on this matter.
Glen
Benson Margulies-4 wrote:
>
> Given Dan's message today to a user, I want to toss out the possibility of
> deprecating the entire Simple front end.
>
--
View this message in context:
http://w
Glen,
I am somewhat puzzled by your position. You put a lot of work into
explaining CXF to people. The existence of the simple front end is one more
thing to explain. I just fielded a JIRA from someone who had managed to
combine classes from the simple and JAX-WS front end into a giant pretzel.
So
Well, given that the entire distributed OSGi stuff is based on the Simple
frontend + aegis (since OSGi services probably don't have jaxws
annotations on them), I would say that it wouldn't be practical to get
rid of it. :-)
Dan
> Benson Margulies-4 wrote:
> > Given Dan's message today to a
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: CFP open for ApacheCon Europe 2009
Date: Thursday 02 October 2008
From: Noirin Shirley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PMCs: Please send this on to your users@ lists!
If you only have thirty seconds:
The Call for Papers for ApacheCon
That's what I call an argument. OK, so much for that.
Should we try to make Simple quietly respect @WebParam and friends?
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, given that the entire distributed OSGi stuff is based on the Simple
> frontend + aegis (since
Basically, fence-sitting. I can definitely see how its removal would be one
less moving part to maintain, and it would also nicely simplify CXF's
documentation, and provide less confusion for users. CXF has grown a
lot--now REST, JMS, WS-Security--and some trimming of its branches (i.e.,
becomin
OK, then, you guys might rise to the bait I offered on the subject of
renaming the classes to actually have 'Simple' in their names :p)
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Glen Mazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Basically, fence-sitting. I can definitely see how its removal would be
> one
> less m
Hi Dan,
I'd like to take charge of this CXF release.
Since you and me met a year before, I will send you my key for signing :)
Cheers,
Willem
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 12:49 AM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We're rappidly approaching time to do the 2.0.9 and 2.1.3 releases.
> It's b
16 matches
Mail list logo
