Glen, I am somewhat puzzled by your position. You put a lot of work into explaining CXF to people. The existence of the simple front end is one more thing to explain. I just fielded a JIRA from someone who had managed to combine classes from the simple and JAX-WS front end into a giant pretzel. So, I could understand your being -1 due to seeing value in thing, or +1 in wanting to make CXF easier to explain, but that giant zero feels like a giant question-mark burning on my lawn.
Could you elaborate on your passionate non-attachment, or would that transgress your lack of a position? --benson On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Glen Mazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm passionately neutral. Few things are more deep-felt than my vote of > zero > on this matter. > > Glen > > > Benson Margulies-4 wrote: > > > > Given Dan's message today to a user, I want to toss out the possibility > of > > deprecating the entire Simple front end. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Status-of-simple-front-end-tp19785030p19786266.html > Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
