Re: Deploying a new 2.0.7-SNAPSHOT

2008-05-27 Thread Eoghan Glynn
Daniel Kulp wrote: On May 27, 2008, at 12:26 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: Thanks Dan, Following the instructions on [1] I've run into an authentication failure after only a few modules are deployed to the repo. Is there a way of rolling back the partially deployed artifacts, do you know? Ju

Re: Deploying a new 2.0.7-SNAPSHOT

2008-05-27 Thread Benson Margulies
PKI already works. Just put your ssh key into your people.apache.org .ssh dir. On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Eoghan Glynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> >> On May 27, 2008, at 12:26 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: >> >> >>> Thanks Dan, >>> >>> Following the instructions on [1] I'

Re: Deploying a new 2.0.7-SNAPSHOT

2008-05-27 Thread Eoghan Glynn
Benson Margulies wrote: PKI already works. Just put your ssh key into your people.apache.org .ssh dir. Thanks Benson ... I was sure I'd copied over my public key ages ago, but just checked my home dir on people.apache.org and I didn't even have a ~/.ssh dir, never mind an authorized_keys

Re: Invalid WSDLs

2008-05-27 Thread Daniel Kulp
On May 26, 2008, at 5:32 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: Yes. I'm also very curious as to whether Dan can shed light as to the intention: should the CXF wsdl validator *only* worry about CXF- specific issues, leaving general validation to generic tools, or does it ambit to cover all of the grou

Re: Invalid WSDLs

2008-05-27 Thread Benson Margulies
My goal here is to catch inadvertently busted WSDL files when we check them in. So, using our validator, I'd at least have to exclude some cases that are supposed to fail. On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On May 26, 2008, at 5:32 PM, Benson Margulies w