On May 26, 2008, at 5:32 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Yes. I'm also very curious as to whether Dan can shed light as to the
intention: should the CXF wsdl validator *only* worry about CXF-
specific
issues, leaving general validation to generic tools, or does it
ambit to
cover all of the ground?
This is kind of a loaded question. I guess the answer is that it
should catch and wsdl issues that CXF users care about. Seriously,
it currently tackles validation for many of the "common" issues that
users have hit. That includes issues hit by some of IONA's customers
since they are CXF "users" as well. There are a bunch of checks for
WSI-BP compliance as well since CXF SHOULD be generating (and
consuming) WSI-BP compliant wsdl whenever possible.
I'd be careful about changing too many wsdl's. Many wsdl's in the
CXF tree are actually there to test some of these "bad" cases. For
example, the hello_world_xml_bare.wsdl issue you mentioned.... That
definitely is an issue in many cases. Currently, if the first parts
match, CXF cannot dispatch it correctly. However, if the soap-
actions are unique, it CAN. There is also a bug logged about it: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1073
There may be tests related to it. I'm not really sure.
Dan
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Glen Mazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
For specific validity questions, you might want to run against
Metro and
see what it says. Although not perfectly reliable, similiar error
messages (or lack thereof) to CXF's might help determine what is not
allowed with WSDL in general compared to what just CXF doesn't like.
Glen
2008-05-26 Benson Margulies wrote:
However, now we get the question of what me mean by 'validate' in
our
tool.
Our validator rejects the wsdl we call hello_world_xml_bare.wsdl
with
the below error, because one operation has a single input part of
element type 'x', and another operation has three inputs parts, the
first of which is also 'x'.
Is this, in fact, unacceptable? Should I change the wsdl to make the
elements distinct? Or is the validator wrong?
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Benson Margulies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
What I'm doing is reflecting the existing command line into maven.
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Glen Mazza
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I believe we have something like this already on the command-line
(-validate option[1]). Perhaps it would be better to build on
this,
so
command-line/Maven/Ant users can use it as well.
Glen
[1] http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/wsdl-to-java.html
2008-05-26 Benson Margulies wrote:
Watchers of checkins can see that I'm inventing a WSDL validation
maven plugin.
First catch:
INFO: Resolve schema http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/2003-02-11.xsd
from baseURI:
jar:file:/home/benson/.m2/repository/org/apache/cxf/cxf-common-
schemas/2.1.1-SNAPSHOT/cxf-common-schemas-2.1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar!/
schemas/wsdl/http.xsd,
namespace: http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Non unique body parts, operation [ greetMe ] and
operation [
testTriPart ] have the same body block
{http://apache.org/hello_world_xml_http/bare/types}requestType
---
Daniel Kulp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
