Re: WS-RM issue

2008-09-06 Thread Eoghan Glynn
Well, yes, at the transport-level the interaction is sort of asynchronous. But from the application-level it would appear to be synchronous. [Unless of course the JAX-WS async callback/pollable model is used, but this is a choice orthogonal to any asynchrony in the transport] So I would see

Re: WS-RM issue

2008-09-05 Thread Bharath Ganesh
So that is kind of an asynchronous invocation. Not a synchronous request-response pattern.That again means the JIRA is not a very valid use case. If convinced, I shall close the JIRA. On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 12:42 AM, Eoghan Glynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dunno if I'd agree with this JIRA,

Re: WS-RM issue

2008-09-05 Thread Eoghan Glynn
Dunno if I'd agree with this JIRA, if I've understood it correctly. For a request-response MEP, WS-RM can be configured so that a "202 Accepted" response is immediately sent back to the client (possibly including an eager ACK) and then whenever it becomes available the real response is sent o