So that is kind of an asynchronous invocation. Not a synchronous request-response pattern.That again means the JIRA is not a very valid use case. If convinced, I shall close the JIRA.
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 12:42 AM, Eoghan Glynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dunno if I'd agree with this JIRA, if I've understood it correctly. > > For a request-response MEP, WS-RM can be configured so that a "202 > Accepted" response is immediately sent back to the client (possibly > including an eager ACK) and then whenever it becomes available the real > response is sent over a separate server->client connection. > > /Eoghan > > > > Bharath Ganesh wrote: > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1156 >> >> Look like WS-RM makes more sense for aysncronous invocation and one way >> invocation (quite similar to JMS reliability), rather than a standard >> request-response pattern. >> So the above issue wont be a very valid case. Am I right? >> >> > ---------------------------- > IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland) > Registered Number: 171387 > Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, Ireland >
