My goal here is to catch inadvertently busted WSDL files when we check them
in. So, using our validator, I'd at least have to exclude some cases that
are supposed to fail.
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On May 26, 2008, at 5:32 PM, Benson Margulies w
On May 26, 2008, at 5:32 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Yes. I'm also very curious as to whether Dan can shed light as to the
intention: should the CXF wsdl validator *only* worry about CXF-
specific
issues, leaving general validation to generic tools, or does it
ambit to
cover all of the grou
