Re: JMS 1.0.2 support......

2008-11-11 Thread Daniel Kulp
apBindingFactory.addListener(SoapBindingFa > > ctory.java:721) > > at org.apache.cxf.endpoint.ServerImpl.start(ServerImpl.java:122) > > at org.apache.cxf.jaxws.EndpointImpl.doPublish(EndpointImpl.java:263) > > at org.apache.cxf.jaxws.EndpointImpl.publish(Endpo

RE: JMS 1.0.2 support......

2008-11-11 Thread Seumas Soltysik
: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 2:11 AM To: Seumas Soltysik Cc: dev@cxf.apache.org; Daniel Kulp Subject: Re: JMS 1.0.2 support.. Hi Seumas, could you post the configuration you used? Greetings Christian Seumas Soltysik schrieb: > I have just upgraded to CXF 2.1.3 and am running against an

RE: JMS 1.0.2 support......

2008-11-11 Thread Seumas Soltysik
- From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008 10:42 AM To: Christian Schneider; dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: JMS 1.0.2 support.. Christian, The old JMS transport pretty much just used the JMS 1.0.2 API's so it worked with old versions of JMS providers and

Re: JMS 1.0.2 support......

2008-11-10 Thread Christian Schneider
org.apache.cxf.jaxws.spi.ProviderImpl.createAndPublishEndpoint(ProviderI mpl.java:84) at javax.xml.ws.Endpoint.publish(Endpoint.java:47) -Original Message- From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008 10:42 AM To: Christian Schneider; dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: JMS 1.0.2 support.. Christian, The old JMS

Re: JMS 1.0.2 support......

2008-10-14 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Saturday 11 October 2008 3:34:52 am Christian Schneider wrote: > Hi Dan, > > sounds reasonable to me. I have added the config element to address and > set the default. I think setting useJms11 to false for 2.0.x and 2.1.x probably makes sense for compatibility sake. For 2.2 (trunk), it proba

Re: JMS 1.0.2 support......

2008-10-11 Thread Christian Schneider
Hi Dan, sounds reasonable to me. I have added the config element to address and set the default. Greetings Christian Daniel Kulp schrieb: Christian, The old JMS transport pretty much just used the JMS 1.0.2 API's so it worked with old versions of JMS providers and such. The new stuff

JMS 1.0.2 support......

2008-10-10 Thread Daniel Kulp
Christian, The old JMS transport pretty much just used the JMS 1.0.2 API's so it worked with old versions of JMS providers and such. The new stuff seems to default to 1.1 which is causing issues.I see that if you use the new config, it's settable. However, if you use the old wsdl based