Hi Christian,
Our configuration is wsdl based. Here is the service description:
<service name="HelloWorldServiceSonic">
<port binding="tns:HelloWorldPortBinding"
name="HelloWorldPortSonic">
<jms:address
jndiConnectionFactoryName="SonicQueueConnectionFactory"
jndiDestinationName="SampleQ4">
<jms:JMSNamingProperty
name="java.naming.factory.initial"
value="com.sonicsw.jndi.mfcontext.MFContextFactory" />
<jms:JMSNamingProperty name="java.naming.provider.url"
value="tcp://pdsunfire.boston.amer.iona.com:2506" />
</jms:address>
<jms:server durableSubscriberName="CXF_subscriber"/>
</port>
</service>
Regards,
Seumas
-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 2:11 AM
To: Seumas Soltysik
Cc: [email protected]; Daniel Kulp
Subject: Re: JMS 1.0.2 support......
Hi Seumas,
could you post the configuration you used?
Greetings
Christian
Seumas Soltysik schrieb:
> I have just upgraded to CXF 2.1.3 and am running against an old
> implementation of SonicMQ version 5, which I believe based upon the
old
> 1.0.2 apis. However, I am still getting a stack which indicates that
CXF
> does still not seem compatible with older versions of JMS. Clearly the
> stack show that a JmsTemplate102 is being used, yet the problem I was
> having with 2.1.2 persists.
>
> java.lang.AbstractMethodError:
>
progress.message.jclient.QueueConnectionFactory.createConnection()Ljavax
> /jms/Connection;
> at
>
org.springframework.jms.connection.UserCredentialsConnectionFactoryAdapt
>
er.doCreateConnection(UserCredentialsConnectionFactoryAdapter.java:177)
> at
>
org.springframework.jms.connection.UserCredentialsConnectionFactoryAdapt
> er.createConnection(UserCredentialsConnectionFactoryAdapter.java:149)
> at
>
org.springframework.jms.connection.SingleConnectionFactory.doCreateConne
> ction(SingleConnectionFactory.java:316)
> at
>
org.springframework.jms.connection.SingleConnectionFactory.initConnectio
> n(SingleConnectionFactory.java:270)
> at
>
org.springframework.jms.connection.SingleConnectionFactory.createConnect
> ion(SingleConnectionFactory.java:215)
> at
>
org.springframework.jms.connection.SingleConnectionFactory.createQueueCo
> nnection(SingleConnectionFactory.java:227)
> at
>
org.springframework.jms.core.JmsTemplate102.createConnection(JmsTemplate
> 102.java:170)
> at
> org.springframework.jms.core.JmsTemplate.execute(JmsTemplate.java:461)
> at
> org.springframework.jms.core.JmsTemplate.execute(JmsTemplate.java:436)
> at
>
org.apache.cxf.transport.jms.JMSFactory.resolveOrCreateDestination(JMSFa
> ctory.java:120)
> at
>
org.apache.cxf.transport.jms.JMSFactory.createJmsListener(JMSFactory.jav
> a:101)
> at
>
org.apache.cxf.transport.jms.JMSDestination.activate(JMSDestination.java
> :99)
> at
>
org.apache.cxf.transport.AbstractObservable.setMessageObserver(AbstractO
> bservable.java:48)
> at
>
org.apache.cxf.binding.AbstractBindingFactory.addListener(AbstractBindin
> gFactory.java:166)
> at
>
org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.SoapBindingFactory.addListener(SoapBindingFa
> ctory.java:721)
> at org.apache.cxf.endpoint.ServerImpl.start(ServerImpl.java:122)
> at org.apache.cxf.jaxws.EndpointImpl.doPublish(EndpointImpl.java:263)
> at org.apache.cxf.jaxws.EndpointImpl.publish(EndpointImpl.java:201)
> at
>
org.apache.cxf.jaxws.spi.ProviderImpl.createAndPublishEndpoint(ProviderI
> mpl.java:84)
> at javax.xml.ws.Endpoint.publish(Endpoint.java:47)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008 10:42 AM
> To: Christian Schneider; [email protected]
> Subject: JMS 1.0.2 support......
>
>
> Christian,
>
> The old JMS transport pretty much just used the JMS 1.0.2 API's so it
> worked
> with old versions of JMS providers and such. The new stuff seems to
> default
> to 1.1 which is causing issues. I see that if you use the new
config,
> it's
> settable. However, if you use the old wsdl based stuff, it cannot.
> I'm
> wondering if it make sense for the line in JMSOldConfigHolder that
> reads:
> jmsConfig.setUseJms11(true);
> should be changed to false to be compatible with the old version?
>
> I suppose we could add a optional "useJms11" attribute (default to
> false) on
> one of the old extensors (address maybe?) to set this so if someone
> wants to
> use 1.1, they could, but default behavior is maintained.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
--
Christian Schneider
---
http://www.liquid-reality.de
