Re: Abusive/harrassing off-list emails

I'm still waiting to see one of the "abusive" emails you speak of Glen. So far you just kind of come off as a goof. And enough with the "inactive" jabs, Jeff's paid his dues. You don't question a Sensei's belt just because you weren't around when he was competing. Craig On 2011-02-27, at 2:10

Re: When do we drop Java 5 support?

I'm *soo* glad I'm out of WAS 6.1 land now, this statement would have sent me running for the hills. :) Craig. On 2011-02-22, at 2:45 AM, Christian Schneider wrote: > Hi all, > > now that camel dropped Java 5 I am asking myself when will we also drop > support for Java 5 in CXF? As CXF 2.4.0

Re: [VOTE] [RESULTS] Dennis Sosnoski for CXF committer

Congrats Dennis! On a side note: I too have a Polish last name but it seems only the Russians recognize it. Craig On 2011-02-19, at 7:19 AM, Glen Mazza wrote: > I'm counting 11 committer +1s: myself, Willem, Jeff, Freeman, Christian, > Sergey, Tomasz (your Polish last name probably came in

Re: How to get the soapBody as an xml in Interceptop

Hi, are you registered for the "user" list? It's more geared toward answering these types of questions than the "dev" list. users-subscr...@cxf.apache.org Craig. On 2011-02-18, at 10:43 AM, kasinath wrote: > > Hi, > I am trying to log all the details SOAPFaultInterceptor. I am using custom >

Re: [CONF] Apache CXF > Commercial CXF Offerings

Speaking as a member of the community (non-commiter outside of a few patches) I don't have a problem with the claims which the CXF supporting companies make on their own site. They are paying people to forward the development of CXF, they should get to stick out their chest and let it be known.

Re: Latest IBM DeveloperWorks article

;Webservices Pack for WAS". I want to use "works regardless of servlet container and support contract". So it was not a "mistake", I fully intended to avoid the Webservices Pack. Craig. > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 21:26, Craig Tataryn wrote: >> We were using WAS

Re: Latest IBM DeveloperWorks article

12-08, at 2:15 PM, Dennis Sosnoski wrote: > On 12/09/2010 08:53 AM, Andreas Veithen wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 14:40, Craig Tataryn wrote: >> >>> That's great, his last article was very helpful at my last contract in >>> saving me from implementing

Re: Latest IBM DeveloperWorks article

That's great, his last article was very helpful at my last contract in saving me from implementing using "Web Services Pack for WAS" (aka Axis) Craig. On 2010-12-08, at 7:33 AM, Jeff Genender wrote: > Fantastic ;-) Kudos to everyone. > > Jeff > > On Dec 8, 2010, at 5:55 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote

Re: Discuss: CXFServlet and spring ApplicationContext

Actually it's used when you want to have web services reside within a Servlet container. It might be Spring aware, but should be Spring neutral. (AFAIK) Craig. On 2010-11-29, at 6:10 PM, Christian Schneider wrote: > I am currently trying to dig deeper into the http transport. > > One part of t

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release CXF 2.3.0

Congrats folks! -- Craig Tataryn site: http://www.basementcoders.com/ podcast: http://www.basementcoders.com/?feed=podcast itunes: http://itunes.apple.com/podcast/the-basement-coders irc: ThaDon on freenode #basementcoders, ##wicket, #papernapkin twitter: craiger On 2010-10-11, at 7:15 AM

Re: To spring 3 or not to spring 3

On 2010-07-17, at 11:00 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > On Saturday 17 July 2010 11:11:03 am Craig Tataryn wrote: >> I think +1 for Spring 3, if a company is going to make the leap to CXF 2.3, >> they are probably willing to make the jump to Spring 3.0. >> >> Would there

Re: To spring 3 or not to spring 3

I think +1 for Spring 3, if a company is going to make the leap to CXF 2.3, they are probably willing to make the jump to Spring 3.0. Would there actually be any @since 3.0 features you'd use from Spring? Or would it be possible they could still operate with 2.5.6 by doing maven excludes on th

Re: Regarding the CXF release 2.0.13

) Craig. -- Craig Tataryn site: http://www.basementcoders.com/ podcast:http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheBasementCoders irc: ThaDon on freenode #basementcoders, ##wicket, #papernapkin twitter: craiger On 2010-06-04, at 8:47 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > Definitely check your JDK version. I know v

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.13/2.1.10/2.2.9

+1 -- Craig Tataryn site: http://www.basementcoders.com/ podcast:http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheBasementCoders irc: ThaDon on freenode #basementcoders, ##wicket, #papernapkin twitter: craiger On 2010-06-03, at 1:36 AM, Cyrille Le Clerc wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:46 P

Re: documentation suggestion

It's mostly due to the fact, I imagine, that CXF is built using Maven so "installing" it just means adding the proper entries to the dependency section of your pom file. Craig. -- Craig Tataryn site: http://www.basementcoders.com/ podcast:http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheBas

Re: 2.2.8 release?

Great comparisons, always good to have something like this to show to people. -- Craig Tataryn site: http://www.basementcoders.com/ podcast:http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheBasementCoders irc: ThaDon on freenode #basementcoders, ##wicket, #papernapkin twitter: craiger On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:36

Re: CXF version 2.2.7?

;>>> Bull, Architect of an Open World TM >>>>> http://www.bull.com >>>>> >>>>> Le 13/03/2010 05:10, AllanSLim a écrit : >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Sergey, >>>>>> >&g

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.2.7

+1 Sent from my iPhone On 2010-03-18, at 6:21 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that have been done compared to the 2.2.6 release. Over 55 JIRA issues are resolved for 2.2.7. List of issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Relea

Re: 2.2.7 next week?

> -- > Daniel Kulp > dk...@apache.org > http://dankulp.com/blog > -- Craig Tataryn site: http://www.basementcoders.com/ podcast:http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheBasementCoders irc: ThaDon on freenode #basementcoders, ##wicket, #papernapkin twitter: craiger

Re: Possible neatening in distribution

Perhaps when is set it will do this? I'm paranoid so I always clean install the parent separately if it chnages. Craig Sent from my iPhone On 2010-03-06, at 3:42 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: Having shamelessly cribbed various maven tricks from CXF into some other project, I recently

Re: Possible fix for resolving classpath schemas issues....

here that > protocol would have come from.  Is there a full stack trace? > > Dan > > > On Thu February 4 2010 7:03:09 pm Craig Tataryn wrote: >> ... when XSDs are held within jar files that have a space in their path. >> >> Here is the scenario: Dan did a patch for

Re: Generating Javadoc from xsd:sequence/xsd:element documentation

gt; Dan > > > >> >> Andreas >> >> [1] https://jaxb.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=172 > > -- > Daniel Kulp > dk...@apache.org > http://www.dankulp.com/blog > -- Craig Tataryn site: http://www.basementcoders.com/ podcast:http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheBasementCoders irc: ThaDon on freenode #basementcoders, ##wicket, #papernapkin twitter: craiger

Re: WSDL 2 SOAP

at 2:22 PM, Demetris wrote: > > Hi all, > >   is there a tool in CXF that can generate SOAP envelopes directly from WSDL > without > generating any stubs? > > Thanks > > -- Craig Tataryn site: http://www.basementcoders.com/ podcast:http://feeds.feedburner.c

Possible fix for resolving classpath schemas issues....

should build cleanly 5) "mvn clean install -e" from CXFSchemaRefProblemWar, you should get the classpath protocol error 6) apply my patch, install the change locally, try step 5 again. Thanks, Craig [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-2599 [2] - http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/vi