Re: SOAP over JMS and CXF.

CXF JMS transport supports JMS URI which is part of JMS over SOAP spec out of box. I think you can use it with JAXRS frontend without any trouble. 2011/2/24, robert : > CXF supports SOAP over JMS; http://www.w3.org/TR/soapjms/. > > Should the bindings and service extensions defined by this spec be

Re: What does CXF use in place of WSDL JMS Extension ?

Thanks... that namespace isn't on this page though: http://cxf.apache.org/docs/schemas-and-namespaces.html. -- Robert On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:06:44 -0500, Daniel Kulp wrote: > On Thursday 24 February 2011 2:26:08 PM robert wrote: >> Does CXF use something in place of the WSDL JMS Extension and th

Re: What does CXF use in place of WSDL JMS Extension ?

On Thursday 24 February 2011 2:26:08 PM robert wrote: > Does CXF use something in place of the WSDL JMS Extension and this > namespace: http://schemas.xmlsopa.org/wsdl/jms? At the last minute, the spec was "changed" so the namespace that is supposed to be used is: http://www.w3.org/2010/soapjms/

Re: Unmarshalling exception: NaN

Perfect! It would appear that we need to investigate our flex client then because it seems to be passing along valid NaNs for floats and doubles, but it's also passing them for integers and we'll need to figure that out. Thanks for the help. Aaron On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Daniel Kulp

Re: What does CXF use in place of WSDL JMS Extension ?

I'll take a look and try to post to the appropriate forums, thanks! -- Robert On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:29:05 -0500, Glen Mazza wrote: > The User's list would be more appropriate for this question, also is > it not already answered within our user's guide? > > Glen > > On 2/24/2011 2:26 PM, rober

Re: What does CXF use in place of WSDL JMS Extension ?

The User's list would be more appropriate for this question, also is it not already answered within our user's guide? Glen On 2/24/2011 2:26 PM, robert wrote: Does CXF use something in place of the WSDL JMS Extension and this namespace: http://schemas.xmlsopa.org/wsdl/jms? Thanks!

What does CXF use in place of WSDL JMS Extension ?

Does CXF use something in place of the WSDL JMS Extension and this namespace: http://schemas.xmlsopa.org/wsdl/jms? Thanks!

Re: Unmarshalling exception: NaN

On Thursday 24 February 2011 9:22:28 AM Aaron Ehrensberger wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm hoping someone can help me out here... > > We recently upgraded CXF from 2.2.3 to 2.3.1. In doing so, it would appear > that some of our webservices have been broken in the process. > > Specifically, the issue w

Re: WSIF JMS EXtensions

Actually, Benson, that might not be the case (I hope it isn't) -- if you look on the Attic: http://attic.apache.org/ they have four Jakarta subprojects listed, and none of the four were TLPs. (Only Jakarta itself is.) Same with Crimson (XML TLP) I suppose. Glen On 01.02.2011 19:42, Benson

Re: SOAP over JMS and CXF.

Hi On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 3:48 PM, robert wrote: > CXF supports SOAP over JMS; http://www.w3.org/TR/soapjms/. > > Should the bindings and service extensions defined by this spec be better > suited in a supported WSDL or WADL? > > I assume WADL as supported by CXF? Yes but only JAX-RS endpoints

SOAP over JMS and CXF.

CXF supports SOAP over JMS; http://www.w3.org/TR/soapjms/. Should the bindings and service extensions defined by this spec be better suited in a supported WSDL or WADL? I assume WADL as supported by CXF? Thanks!

Re: WADLs

I think you'll find that the reliability guarantees just don't exist in ActiveMQ's REST interface and that it is very feature-light. (FYI, not saying ActiveMQ can't guarantee reliability, just that its REST interface is kinda weak). On 2/24/11 10:27 AM, robert wrote: I'm looking at the Acti

Mailing List Clutter

My bad... I posted the same message to the users and dev mailing lists... as I thought the users post did not go through (as I thought the delay meant I was unsubscribed). ... sorry about the clutter... on this one too. -- Robert

Re: WADLs

I'm looking at the ActiveMQ REST Interface documentation now... http://activemq.apache.org/rest.html Thanks! Robert On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:19:19 +, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: >>> Check out HornetQ's REST interface: >>> >>> http://jboss.org/hornetq/rest >>> >> This is of course a fine effort, b

Re: WADLs

Hi On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 2:37 PM, robert wrote: > > Thanks for the info... I'm still trying to figure some things out > though... > > Looks like WSDLs for REST are supported with WSDL 2.0: > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-restwsdl/. > > So with REST... should the targe

WSIF JMS EXtensions

Is Apache WSIF JMS extensions considered dead too (in addition to the main project Apache WSIF) ? http://ws.apache.org/wsif/providers/wsdl_extensions/jms_extension.html Exactly what is going on with WSIF? Is it still hanging on? Or did someone make the move to make it a TLP and retire it?

Re: WADLs

Hi Bill On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Bill Burke wrote: > > > On 2/24/11 9:17 AM, robert wrote: >> >> Also, what would be more applicable, WADLs or WSDLs in support of >> JMS/RESTful services? >> > > Check out HornetQ's REST interface: > > http://jboss.org/hornetq/rest > This is of course a fi

Re: WADLs

>> Check out HornetQ's REST interface: >> >> http://jboss.org/hornetq/rest >> > This is of course a fine effort, but it's off-topic for the CXF dev list :-) though supporting the interface you've built for HornetQ might be an interesting option - but I guess it would be more of interest to the Act

Re: Unmarshalling exception: NaN

Best to ask on the CXF User's list, devs are on both, but many more people are on Users. You can look over the wire to see what is being sent/received[1] differently--it could be something different, or in addition to, the NaN issue. I believe we went from JAXB 2.1 to 2.2 between CXF 2.2 and

Re: WADLs

On 2/24/11 9:17 AM, robert wrote: Also, what would be more applicable, WADLs or WSDLs in support of JMS/RESTful services? Check out HornetQ's REST interface: http://jboss.org/hornetq/rest -- Bill Burke JBoss, a division of Red Hat http://bill.burkecentral.com

Re: WADLs

Thanks for the info... I'm still trying to figure some things out though... Looks like WSDLs for REST are supported with WSDL 2.0: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-restwsdl/. So with REST... should the target be in using WSDLs (i.e. 2.0), WADLs, or neither... or it depend

Re: WADLs

You can at least view the WADL using ?_wadl at the end of the service string in a browser. Unsure, but JMS/REST would seem to be a contradiction, because REST is based on the HTTP transport. Glen On 2/24/2011 9:17 AM, robert wrote: The Web Application Description Language (WADL) is new to m

Unmarshalling exception: NaN

Hi all, I'm hoping someone can help me out here... We recently upgraded CXF from 2.2.3 to 2.3.1. In doing so, it would appear that some of our webservices have been broken in the process. Specifically, the issue we're having is that our client is passing across a field like NaN, which previousl

WADLs

The Web Application Description Language (WADL) is new to me. Does CXF support WADLs in any way, relative to the REST style? Also, what would be more applicable, WADLs or WSDLs in support of JMS/RESTful services? Thanks!

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.3

+1. Colm. On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Glen Mazza wrote: > +1 > > Glen > > On 2/23/2011 6:23 PM, Eric Johnson wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Sergey Beryozkin >>  wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> thanks, Sergey >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Daniel Kulp  wrote: >>>

Re: svn commit: r1074119 - in /cxf/branches/2.3.x-fixes/rt/transports/http/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/transport: http/AbstractHTTPDestination.java http/Servlet3ContinuationProvider.java servlet/Serv

Hi Willem Are you planning to commit to the trunk ? Just wondering why you started from the 2.3.x branch... Cheers, Sergey On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:58 AM, wrote: > Author: ningjiang > Date: Thu Feb 24 11:58:26 2011 > New Revision: 1074119 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1074119&vie

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.3

+1 Glen On 2/23/2011 6:23 PM, Eric Johnson wrote: +1 On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: +1 thanks, Sergey On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: We've resolved over 50 issues since 2.3.2. Thus, we really should get 2.3.3 out, especially since 2.3.2

RE: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.3

+1 -Original Message- From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org] Sent: 23 February 2011 20:31 To: dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.3 We've resolved over 50 issues since 2.3.2. Thus, we really should get 2.3.3 out, especially since 2.3.2 contained an issue preventin

Re: LogBrowser project is on the trunk

Hi Sergey, On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: > Hi Tomasz > > 1. LogBrowser has a showstopper bug which I'm sure is due to the fact we > just did not look at it for a while :-). Basically, when I go and generate > the logs, and then click 'refresh' on the en

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.3

+1 Alessio On 02/23/2011 09:30 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: We've resolved over 50 issues since 2.3.2. Thus, we really should get 2.3.3 out, especially since 2.3.2 contained an issue preventing it from being used as a JAX-WS implementation for J2EE containers. List of issues: https://issues.a

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.3

+1 On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Freeman Fang wrote: > +1 > > Freeman > On 2011-2-24, at 上午4:30, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> >> >> We've resolved over 50 issues since 2.3.2.   Thus, we really should get >> 2.3.3 out, especially since 2.3.2 contained an issue preventing it from >> being used as a