Hi On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 2:37 PM, robert <rob...@gliesian.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the info... I'm still trying to figure some things out > though... > > Looks like WSDLs for REST are supported with WSDL 2.0: > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-restwsdl/. > > So with REST... should the target be in using WSDLs (i.e. 2.0), WADLs, > or neither... or it depends? >
CXF supports WADL and we plan to enhance the WADL support for it to be applied to the server side development. > And CXF doesn't support WSDL 2.0, correct? No, it does not. However, WADL is superior to WSDL 2.0 RESTful descriptions, IMHO. If you do prefer WSDL-first for developing SOAP services and thus also want to use the same document for generating the RESTful annotations then applying CXF JAX-RS user models can easily compensate for the fact we do not do WSDL 2.0 cheers, Sergey > > -- Robert > > On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:24:18 -0500, Glen Mazza <gma...@talend.com> > wrote: >> You can at least view the WADL using ?_wadl at the end of the service >> string in a browser. >> >> Unsure, but JMS/REST would seem to be a contradiction, because REST >> is based on the HTTP transport. >> >> Glen >> >> On 2/24/2011 9:17 AM, robert wrote: >>> The Web Application Description Language (WADL) is new to me. >>> >>> Does CXF support WADLs in any way, relative to the REST style? >>> >>> Also, what would be more applicable, WADLs or WSDLs in support of >>> JMS/RESTful services? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> > >
