Re: SLF4J instead of Log4J at the API level? [EXTERNAL]

2024-07-27 Thread Gandhirajan N
Hi Richard, Thanks for the initial PR. I had a look at the PR and the changes look good with regards to SLF4J. However, the versionRange in root POM could introduce unpredictability in builds if newer versions introduce breaking changes On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 at 06:06, Richard Eckart de Castilho wr

Re: SLF4J instead of Log4J at the API level? [EXTERNAL]

2024-07-27 Thread Gandhirajan N
you can find a different solution I'm > good with that too. In any case, this change should only affect Eclipse > users. > > Peter > > On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 10:09 AM Gandhirajan N > wrote: > > > Hi Richard, > > > > Thanks for the initial PR. I ha

Re: Fw: Please test the cTAKES-6.0.0 candidate for release

2024-09-12 Thread Gandhirajan N
Hi Sean, Apart from the broken ctakes-ytex test cases, everything else looks good to me. On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 19:23, Finan, Sean wrote: > Hi all, > > I have requested a vote on the release by the Apache cTAKES Project > Management Committee (PMC). The vote will end at 5:pm next Monday, > Se