Very pleased to see so many people offer suggestions! Comparing some of
these different methods might make an interesting student project.
Sean:
> Just an fyi. Does that make sense? Haven't had my coffee ...
Makes perfect sense, the downside is it requires some kind of higher
level understanding
I was thinking the same thing as Steve. Thats a pretty regular onc physical
exam, why not just split sentences with regex's off a small list of defined onc
physical exam terms? The interesting case would be breast, as this term may
appear in the body of a sentence (rather than just a term), but
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Miller, Timothy
wrote:
> PE: Lymphnodes: neck and axilla without adenopathy Lungs: normal and clear to
> auscultation CV: regular rate and rhythm without murmur or gallop , S1, S2
> normal, no murmur, click, rub or gal*, chest is clear without rales or
> wheezing
ven't had my coffee ...
Sean
> -Original Message-
> From: Miller, Timothy [mailto:timothy.mil...@childrens.harvard.edu]
> Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2014 7:44 AM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> Subject: RE: question about sentence segmentation
>
> I'm annota
; in clinical data than in edited text, but I'm sure we all knew that already
> :)
>
> Tim
>
>
>
> From: Miller, Timothy [timothy.mil...@childrens.harvard.edu]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 2:38 PM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> S
m is much more complex in
clinical data than in edited text, but I'm sure we all knew that already :)
Tim
From: Miller, Timothy [timothy.mil...@childrens.harvard.edu]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 2:38 PM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Re: question ab
sday, July 15, 2014 4:39 PM
To: 'dev@ctakes.apache.org<mailto:dev@ctakes.apache.org>'
Subject: RE: question about sentence segmentation
Sorry, I don't know if there was a reason.
If you haven't checked with Guergana, you might want to ask her if she had a
reason or if
l use that for the training data and hopefully that will illuminate
> the tricky cases.
>
> Tim
>
>
> From: Masanz, James J. [masanz.ja...@mayo.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 4:39 PM
> To: 'dev@ctakes.apache.org'
hildrens.harvard.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 3:34 PM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Re: question about sentence segmentation
Thanks James, I was hoping to hear from you. I'll probably go ahead and
change the data to split sentences between the list header and list element.
You don
arvard.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 3:34 PM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Re: question about sentence segmentation
Thanks James, I was hoping to hear from you. I'll probably go ahead and
change the data to split sentences between the list header and list element.
You don't happen
a I should have a
> default in mind.
>
> Does anyone have any objections to changing the sentence detector behavior to
> break list headers (things like "3." or "A " or "#5") as their own sentence?
>
> Tim
>
>
>
ine a separate sentence.
#1 Dilated esophagus.
#2 Adenocarcinoma
-- James
-Original Message-
From: Miller, Timothy [mailto:timothy.mil...@childrens.harvard.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 6:04 AM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: RE: question about sentence segmentation
> My prefe
quot;3." or "A " or "#5") as their own sentence?
Tim
From: Britt Fitch [britt.fi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 8:29 AM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Re: question about sentence segmentation
My preference is to tr
My preference is to treat the list row number as outside of the sentence of
interest.
Or if it is necessary to be included in a sentence, have it be a sentence
on its own.
That won't be as straightforward as splitting on a period in cases
like "2. Magnesium
oxide 400 mg p.o. daily."
In cases where
14 matches
Mail list logo
