Re: Phenotype-specific entities [SUSPICIOUS] [SUSPICIOUS]

s a neo4j graph database with all the ISA links, and has a simple API > for getting parent/child CUIs. > I used it for coreference. > Tim > > > From: Finan, Sean > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 2:23 PM > To: dev@ctakes.apach

RE: Phenotype-specific entities [SUSPICIOUS] [SUSPICIOUS] [SUSPICIOUS]

Thanks, all! -Erin -Original Message- From: Finan, Sean [mailto:sean.fi...@childrens.harvard.edu] Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 1:28 PM To: dev@ctakes.apache.org Subject: RE: Phenotype-specific entities [SUSPICIOUS] [SUSPICIOUS] [SUSPICIOUS] Hi Tim, Lol rbay, I remembered your

RE: Phenotype-specific entities [SUSPICIOUS] [SUSPICIOUS] [SUSPICIOUS]

it for coreference. Tim From: Finan, Sean Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 2:23 PM To: dev@ctakes.apache.org Subject: RE: Phenotype-specific entities [SUSPICIOUS] [SUSPICIOUS] The dictionary gui doesn't walk the ontology. There are umls tables that list relati

Re: Phenotype-specific entities [SUSPICIOUS] [SUSPICIOUS]

From: Finan, Sean Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 2:23 PM To: dev@ctakes.apache.org Subject: RE: Phenotype-specific entities [SUSPICIOUS] [SUSPICIOUS] The dictionary gui doesn't walk the ontology. There are umls tables that list relations, wherein t

RE: Phenotype-specific entities [SUSPICIOUS]

, it could be a valuable seed for a new effort. Sean -Original Message- From: Savova, Guergana [mailto:guergana.sav...@childrens.harvard.edu] Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 1:54 PM To: dev@ctakes.apache.org Subject: RE: Phenotype-specific entities [SUSPICIOUS] I don't believe

RE: Phenotype-specific entities

I was able to get that information from them... Sean, Does your dictionary building tool implement ontology walking? --Guergana -Original Message- From: Dligach, Dmitriy [mailto:ddlig...@luc.edu] Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 1:50 PM To: dev@ctakes.apache.org Subject: Re: Phen

Re: Phenotype-specific entities

Guergana, thank you. Is there anything in cTAKES now for walking the UMLS ontology (e.g. for finding hypernyms, synonyms, etc.)? Dima > On Feb 15, 2017, at 12:45, Savova, Guergana > wrote: > > Hi Erin, > Yes, creating your customized dictionary is the way to go. You can prune by > semant

RE: Phenotype-specific entities

Hi Erin, Yes, creating your customized dictionary is the way to go. You can prune by semantic types of interest and then remove branches that are not relevant to your specific phenotype. I am not aware of cTAKES implementing such a tool for a very customized dictionary. You can also start with