On 9 April 2013 16:55, Paul Davis >
wrote:
> I'm all for bumping our minimum requirement. Reading Bob's commit I'm
> not exactly sure which part is requiring a newer Erlang. Maybe one of
> the crypto functions is new?
I think they're just leaving behind older Erlangs. And possibly that TZ
code too
Sue Lockwood created COUCHDB-1768:
-
Summary: When breadcrumb array is empty, do not load the
breadcrumb view
Key: COUCHDB-1768
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1768
Project: CouchDB
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Cottlehuber reassigned COUCHDB-1767:
-
Assignee: Dave Cottlehuber
> tidy up replicator docs
>
Dave Cottlehuber created COUCHDB-1767:
-
Summary: tidy up replicator docs
Key: COUCHDB-1767
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1767
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type: Improvement
Of course you can ignore anything that is asked during a meeting. But
what is a point of a meeting then? Note that "obligatory" was under
quotes in my original sentence as well.
A meeting if needed should be constructive. My point when *I*
suggested to have a meeting was to have an informal meetup