On 9 April 2013 16:55, Paul Davis <[email protected]<javascript:;>> wrote: > I'm all for bumping our minimum requirement. Reading Bob's commit I'm > not exactly sure which part is requiring a newer Erlang. Maybe one of > the crypto functions is new?
I think they're just leaving behind older Erlangs. And possibly that TZ code too, fixed in R14. I assume the OTP team do still support R13B series (albeit internally) until end of 2013? Not that its so relevant for us. -- Sent from my PDP11
