Re: RFC: many PMCs have not provided DOAPs

2023-09-06 Thread Michael Sokolov
hm, whatever it is that populates the data we get that helps to seed board reports. Sorry, maybe that's reporter? On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 9:13 AM sebb wrote: > > On Wed, 6 Sept 2023 at 13:51, Michael Sokolov wrote: > > > > Perhaps if we used the information in these files to drive creation of > >

Re: RFC: many PMCs have not provided DOAPs

2023-09-06 Thread sebb
On Wed, 6 Sept 2023 at 13:51, Michael Sokolov wrote: > > Perhaps if we used the information in these files to drive creation of > the board report templates in whimsy, projects would have some > stronger incentive to keep them up to date? Or ... maybe we do that > already? I'm not sure though beca

Re: RFC: many PMCs have not provided DOAPs

2023-09-06 Thread Michael Sokolov
Perhaps if we used the information in these files to drive creation of the board report templates in whimsy, projects would have some stronger incentive to keep them up to date? Or ... maybe we do that already? I'm not sure though because for example we provide https://git-wip-

Re: RFC: many PMCs have not provided DOAPs

2023-09-06 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Thanks Sebb. Very useful/much appreciated. > If they are independent products - i.e. can be used independently - then I would say yes. Nope. They are "extensions" of the "core" airflow. You cannot use them without "some" version of airflow installed as well. > Seems to me that individual provide

Re: RFC: many PMCs have not provided DOAPs

2023-09-06 Thread sebb
On Wed, 6 Sept 2023 at 09:13, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > We just added DOAP for airflow (core project) and I am planning to add > release information for it automatically as well now when I see it working. > > I have a question about good practices though, before I make the next step > - which is aut

Re: RFC: many PMCs have not provided DOAPs

2023-09-06 Thread Jarek Potiuk
We just added DOAP for airflow (core project) and I am planning to add release information for it automatically as well now when I see it working. I have a question about good practices though, before I make the next step - which is automating generation of all the DOAPs of ours. In the Apache Ai

Re: RFC: many PMCs have not provided DOAPs

2023-09-06 Thread Martijn Dashorst
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 6:45 PM wrote: > On Tue, 2023-09-05 at 17:19 +0100, sebb wrote: > > I doubt it will ever be possible to ensure that fields like releases > > are kept up to date. > > It appears that we have *some* projects that update the doap file as > part of their release runbook. But, y

Re: RFC: many PMCs have not provided DOAPs

2023-09-05 Thread rbowen
On Tue, 2023-09-05 at 17:19 +0100, sebb wrote: > I doubt it will ever be possible to ensure that fields like releases > are kept up to date. It appears that we have *some* projects that update the doap file as part of their release runbook. But, yeah, not all of them. With all of the variations i

Re: RFC: many PMCs have not provided DOAPs

2023-09-05 Thread sebb
On Tue, 5 Sept 2023 at 16:28, wrote: > > On Tue, 2023-09-05 at 17:11 +0200, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > > I think a lot of DOAP files may be out of date as well. At least for > > Wicket > > we have moved our site SCM from svn to git a long time ago, but > > didn't > > realise that project.a.o needed

Re: RFC: many PMCs have not provided DOAPs

2023-09-05 Thread rbowen
On Tue, 2023-09-05 at 17:11 +0200, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > I think a lot of DOAP files may be out of date as well. At least for > Wicket > we have moved our site SCM from svn to git a long time ago, but > didn't > realise that project.a.o needed updating. > > Suffice to say, Wicket has had sever

Re: RFC: many PMCs have not provided DOAPs

2023-09-05 Thread Martijn Dashorst
I think a lot of DOAP files may be out of date as well. At least for Wicket we have moved our site SCM from svn to git a long time ago, but didn't realise that project.a.o needed updating. Suffice to say, Wicket has had several (major and minor) releases since 2015-02-02... It might be prudent to

Re: RFC: many PMCs have not provided DOAPs

2023-09-05 Thread rbowen
On Tue, 2023-09-05 at 09:03 -0400, rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: > So, I'm working through this list: > https://boxofclue.com/doap_projects.txt by sending each project a > reminder of the process, and the reasons it matters (See > https://hackmd.io/AtAuQ60JRbWcH8-OsCHccQ for my template). I am not > p

Re: RFC: many PMCs have not provided DOAPs

2023-09-05 Thread Gary Gregory
I'm not I know what that entails. Gary On Tue, Sep 5, 2023, 10:26 AM wrote: > On Tue, 2023-09-05 at 09:55 -0400, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > https://boxofclue.com/doap_projects.txt by sending each project a > > > > Eat own dog food ;-) https://paste.apache.org/ > > Just to be clear ... are you vo

Re: RFC: many PMCs have not provided DOAPs

2023-09-05 Thread rbowen
On Tue, 2023-09-05 at 09:55 -0400, Gary Gregory wrote: > > https://boxofclue.com/doap_projects.txt by sending each project a > > Eat own dog food ;-) https://paste.apache.org/ Just to be clear ... are you volunteering to help with this outreach? --

Re: RFC: many PMCs have not provided DOAPs

2023-09-05 Thread Gary Gregory
> https://boxofclue.com/doap_projects.txt by sending each project a Eat own dog food ;-) https://paste.apache.org/ Gary On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 9:03 AM wrote: > > Hey, ComDev folks, > > Sebb sent the below to board@ earlier today, and I took it upon myself > to ping some of these projects, in th

Re: RFC: many PMCs have not provided DOAPs

2023-09-05 Thread rbowen
Hey, ComDev folks, Sebb sent the below to board@ earlier today, and I took it upon myself to ping some of these projects, in the hopes that we can get better data about our projects. It's bugged me for a while how many of our projects have meaningless descriptions, and it's been on my list for a